Department enacts new fees for vital records including birth and death certificates

March 10, 2025 | House Bills (Introduced), 2025 Bills, Maryland Legislation Bills Collections, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Department enacts new fees for vital records including birth and death certificates
Maryland's House Bill 466, introduced on March 10, 2025, is stirring discussions with its proposed changes to fees associated with vital records, including birth, death, marriage, and divorce certificates. The bill aims to streamline the process while adjusting the financial obligations for obtaining these essential documents.

At the heart of House Bill 466 is a new fee structure: a $12 charge for certified copies of fetal death, marriage, or divorce verification certificates, and a $10 fee for birth certificates. Additionally, the bill stipulates fees for searches that yield no results and for changes made to certificates after one year of registration. Notably, the legislation exempts current and former members of the uniformed services, along with their surviving spouses and children, from these fees when the records are needed for claims related to benefits.

The introduction of this bill has sparked debates among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Proponents argue that the adjustments will help fund the Department's operations while ensuring that vital records remain accessible. Critics, however, express concern that increased fees could disproportionately affect low-income families needing these documents for essential services.

The implications of House Bill 466 extend beyond just financial aspects. By potentially increasing the cost of obtaining vital records, the bill raises questions about access to important documentation, which can impact everything from healthcare to legal rights. Experts warn that while the bill aims to modernize the process, it could inadvertently create barriers for those already facing economic challenges.

As discussions continue, the future of House Bill 466 remains uncertain. Lawmakers will need to weigh the benefits of increased funding against the potential risks of limiting access to vital records. The outcome could set a precedent for how states manage vital record fees and accessibility in the years to come.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI