On March 10, 2025, Maryland's House Bill 513 was introduced, aiming to impose restrictions on the keeping of roosters within the state. The bill, sponsored by a group of delegates including Allen, Lehman, and Bagnall, seeks to address ongoing issues related to illegal cockfighting and the associated risks of Avian Flu transmission.

The primary provision of House Bill 513 prohibits individuals from keeping a specified number of roosters on their property unless they receive authorization from the Maryland Department of Agriculture. This measure is designed to mitigate the risks posed by breeding roosters for cockfighting, which has been linked to the spread of infectious diseases among poultry.

The bill also empowers the Department of Agriculture to collaborate with local animal control and law enforcement officers to enforce these restrictions effectively. This cooperative approach aims to enhance compliance and address the illegal activities surrounding cockfighting, which remain a concern despite existing laws prohibiting the practice.

Debate surrounding House Bill 513 has highlighted the balance between agricultural practices and public health concerns. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step to protect both animal welfare and public health, while opponents express concerns about potential overreach and the impact on small-scale poultry keepers who may rely on roosters for breeding or other agricultural purposes.

The implications of this legislation could be significant, as it not only addresses animal welfare and public health but also reflects broader societal attitudes towards animal rights and agricultural practices. Experts suggest that if passed, the bill could lead to increased scrutiny of poultry farming practices in Maryland, potentially influencing similar legislative efforts in other states.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, stakeholders from various sectors, including agriculture, animal rights advocacy, and public health, will likely continue to engage in discussions about its potential impacts and necessary amendments. The outcome of House Bill 513 could set a precedent for how states regulate the keeping of livestock in relation to public health and animal welfare concerns.