A proposed bill, HB 129, known as the "Defend the Guard Act," is stirring significant debate in Tennessee's legislature. This legislation aims to keep the Tennessee National Guard focused on state duties by prohibiting its deployment into federal active duty combat unless Congress formally declares war. Advocates argue that this aligns with the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress the power to declare war, and prevents the National Guard from being entangled in endless conflicts without accountability.

During a recent Public Service Subcommittee meeting, supporters highlighted the need for the National Guard to prioritize local emergencies over overseas deployments. Representative Rutter emphasized that the bill would ensure Tennessee's troops remain available for state emergencies, citing past instances where guardsmen were deployed overseas during natural disasters at home. "If a war is worth fighting for, it should be worth Congress voting for," she stated, urging lawmakers to support the bill.

Testimonies from various individuals, including veterans and citizens, reinforced the call for the bill. Samantha Zukowski, a disaster relief volunteer, shared her concerns about the vulnerability of Tennessee during crises when guardsmen were deployed abroad. "Tennessee was left vulnerable, and many of our strongest, most capable citizens were not able to help their neighbors in their time of need," she said.

However, opposition to the bill is strong. Major General Warner Ross, the Adjutant General of the Tennessee National Guard, warned that the legislation could jeopardize military readiness and funding. He argued that the National Guard's dual mission—serving both state and federal roles—requires a balance that the bill could disrupt. "This legislation isolates the Tennessee National Guard and puts our state and citizens at significant disadvantage compared to those states who do not have this legislation," he cautioned.

The discussion around HB 129 reflects a broader concern about the role of the National Guard in modern military engagements and the implications of federal versus state control. As the committee continues to deliberate, the outcome of this bill could reshape the future of the Tennessee National Guard and its ability to respond to both local and national emergencies.