Residents oppose Littleton's plan to pave Mineral Trail with concrete

March 05, 2025 | Littleton City, Arapahoe County, Colorado

Thanks to Scribe from Workplace AI , all articles about Colorado are free for you to enjoy throughout 2025!


This article was created by AI using a video recording of the meeting. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Link to Full Meeting

Residents of Littleton voiced strong opposition to plans for paving the Mineral Trail with concrete during the City Council meeting on March 4, 2025. Community members expressed concerns that the decision, part of the Mineral Mobility Improvements Project, disregards public input and threatens the trail's natural beauty and safety.

Mark Flank, a District 3 resident, highlighted the trail's unique features, including its aesthetic appeal and exercise benefits. He warned that paving the trail would attract more cyclists, particularly electric bike users, leading to dangerous speeds that could endanger walkers and pets. Flank urged the council to preserve the trail's character and avoid concrete.
final logo

Before you scroll further...

Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!

Subscribe for Free

Ned Stern echoed these sentiments, questioning the city's decision to ignore survey results showing a preference for a dual surface trail. He criticized the lack of public engagement in the planning process and called for a reconsideration of the project, suggesting that funds could be better spent on maintaining the existing trail.

Tammy Whitney, another resident, emphasized the trail's suitability for various users, including equestrians, and warned that concrete would not accommodate horses. She pointed out that a significant majority of residents opposed the paving, urging the council to heed their voices.

Family Scribe
Custom Ad
The meeting also touched on another contentious issue: the proposed installation of 32 gas pumps at Mineral Place. Greg Sullivan raised alarms about the environmental impact, citing potential air quality issues and increased traffic from fuel deliveries. He presented a petition with over 200 signatures demanding a reevaluation of the project, arguing that it contradicts the city's commitment to enhancing residents' quality of life.

As the council considers these pressing concerns, the future of the Mineral Trail and the gas station proposal remains uncertain, with community members advocating for a more sustainable and inclusive approach to development.

Converted from City Council Regular Meeting - 03/04/2025 meeting on March 05, 2025
Link to Full Meeting

Comments

    View full meeting

    This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

    View full meeting

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Colorado articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI