Taunton Zoning Board debates expansion of mixed-use building amid parking concerns

The Taunton City Zoning Board of Appeals convened on December 19, 2024, to discuss a proposed expansion of a mixed-use building that has sparked significant debate among board members regarding parking requirements and the potential impact on the neighborhood.

The primary focus of the meeting was a proposal to expand an existing building, which includes residential units and a restaurant. Board members expressed concerns about the number of residential units being increased from three to six, which they argued would necessitate additional parking spaces. According to the city ordinance, the requirement is two parking spots per unit, meaning the proposed six units would require twelve parking spaces. Some board members emphasized that the increase in units would lead to more cars, noise, and overall density in the area, which could be detrimental to the neighborhood.

Despite these concerns, the applicant argued that they were meeting the parking requirements set forth in the ordinance and highlighted that Taunton's parking regulations are more lenient compared to other towns. They pointed out that the planning board had indicated support for the proposal, suggesting that the expansion would enhance the building's functionality and aesthetic appeal.

The discussion also touched on the jurisdiction of the zoning board versus the planning board. Several members noted that the zoning board's role was limited to assessing the dimensional aspects of the building expansion, while the planning board would handle the specifics of the use and number of units. This distinction led to a debate about whether the zoning board could impose conditions on the number of units, with some members arguing that doing so would undermine the planning board's authority.

Public support for the project was evident, with 47 residents from Taunton and one from Norton endorsing the proposal. City departments, including the fire department and water department, indicated no objections to the expansion, although the health department noted that certain upgrades might be necessary.

As the meeting concluded, board members were urged to consider the implications of their decision carefully. The proposal's future remains uncertain, as the board weighs the benefits of the expansion against the potential impact on the community. Further discussions and public input may be sought before a final decision is made.