New York Senate votes to prohibit use of excited delirium in medical diagnoses

March 04, 2025 | 2025 Legislature NY, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

New York Senate votes to prohibit use of excited delirium in medical diagnoses
In a recent meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Health, significant discussions centered around two key pieces of legislation aimed at addressing public health concerns and the implications of certain terminologies in medical diagnoses.

The first major topic was the amendment of a bill concerning the definition of residency in relation to state benefits. Committee members acknowledged the importance of clarifying what constitutes a resident, particularly as it pertains to the benefits being extended. This amendment was approved and will move forward to the finance committee for further consideration.

The second and more impactful discussion revolved around Senate Bill 1714, introduced by Senator Brooke, which seeks to prohibit the use of the term "excited delirium" as a diagnosis or cause of death. Senator Gruber highlighted the troubling history of this term, noting that it lacks scientific backing and has been criticized by major medical organizations, including the American Psychological Association and the American Medical Association. These organizations have pointed out that the term has often been misused to justify excessive police force, particularly in cases involving Black individuals.

Senator Gruber emphasized the need for more accurate medical terminology, citing the disproportionate impact of "excited delirium" in cases of in-custody deaths, particularly among Black men. He referenced studies indicating that this term has been used inappropriately in numerous cases, including the high-profile death of Daniel Prude. The committee expressed strong support for the bill, recognizing its potential to address systemic issues within law enforcement and medical practices.

The meeting concluded with a unanimous vote in favor of both bills, reflecting a commitment to advancing public health legislation and addressing the implications of outdated and harmful terminology in medical contexts. As these bills progress, they may pave the way for more equitable treatment and a reevaluation of how medical diagnoses are approached in the state of New York.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI