Doctor Tarlton opposes House Bill 34 57 citing risks to South Carolina women's health

March 04, 2025 | Judiciary, Standing, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Committees, Legislative, South Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Doctor Tarlton opposes House Bill 34 57 citing risks to South Carolina women's health
In a recent meeting of the South Carolina House Judiciary Committee, significant concerns were raised regarding House Bill 3457, also known as the Human Life Protection Act. Medical professionals, including obstetricians and gynecologists, voiced strong opposition to the bill, arguing that it poses serious risks to women's health and undermines the standard of care that physicians are sworn to uphold.

Dr. Jessica Tarlton, a board-certified OB-GYN, highlighted the troubling implications of the bill, stating that restrictive abortion laws could lead to criminal charges against doctors who provide necessary medical interventions. She emphasized that such laws could deter physicians from practicing in South Carolina, exacerbating the already limited access to prenatal and reproductive healthcare in the state. With 17 of South Carolina's 46 counties lacking an OB-GYN, the potential exodus of healthcare providers could leave many women without essential services.

The discussion also touched on the alarming maternal mortality rate in South Carolina, which ranked eighth highest in the nation in 2024. Dr. Tarlton and her colleagues expressed fears that continued passage of restrictive abortion legislation could worsen this statistic, putting more lives at risk. They urged lawmakers to consider the real-life consequences of their decisions, particularly for patients like Taylor, a woman who suffered due to the limitations imposed by current laws.

The physicians advocated for a model of shared decision-making between doctors and patients, arguing that medical decisions should not be dictated by lawmakers without medical training. They stressed the importance of understanding each patient's unique circumstances and values, which may not align with the one-size-fits-all approach of restrictive legislation.

As the committee deliberates on House Bill 3457, the voices of healthcare professionals underscore the urgent need for policies that prioritize patient care and safety over punitive measures. The outcome of this bill could have lasting implications for women's health and access to care in South Carolina, making it a critical issue for residents and lawmakers alike.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting