[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6653192,"mediaKeyId","2485517-9b01fe1228be7d3ed22b2fcbb1413051","parentId",2485517,"title","Planning board hears concept plan for New Hampshire Veterinary Center for Wildlife in Goffstown Road area","audioSeconds",1138,"startMs",302000,"endMs",1440000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2485517-9b01fe1228be7d3ed22b2fcbb1413051&start=302&end=1440","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2485517-9b01fe1228be7d3ed22b2fcbb1413051/thumbnail_302000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6653192/Hooksett/Merrimack-County/New-Hampshire/Planning-board-hears-concept-plan-for-New-Hampshire-Veterinary-Center-for-Wildlife-in-Goffstown-Road-area","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6653192-d3a430c9a73819c06ff5e05ac5ce0a74/orig.mp4?Expires=1771198344&Signature=oyc2-QksZ2FxN34UUAe6ztlJdvQj1MzH9ajnlS5Bw1dEkNlvlxTiXuG42maCNVIeKnx8nmretGilgbLzvvaVdp4pfXEKnzncHE-kRF6deH1rS09XNudmoIYuHm~~HZaKXJuHclVCFomqfEwuGmrHzNahUh6XWfPSnFnDJNq9wLHhuipjgvIDufu75HDXAsuX24PlmWGhRxZPunD~ZFB4brtPTqETb8Jilzl~u0Qc26bV9kFTx1rXEgCEFtFfI~f-t4TLF7H5Vh9yxYbOMdSzR0JF5z53jeAEoQfJ5HgZFkkYrAW1fmRsuLBtnQjsqOotSsGL-yaMXefmjgMFV-2d9Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Hooksett","date","2025-03-03T00:00:00Z","article","The Hooksett Planning Board on March 3 heard a concept presentation for the New Hampshire Veterinary Center for Wildlife, a proposed wildlife rescue, surgery and rehabilitation facility on a roughly 100-acre tract at 30 Goffstown Road (Map 22, Lot 4). The presenters said the proposal would convert about 21 acres for the center while leaving most of the property wooded.

At the public concept discussion, Helen Dutton, co-founder of the New Hampshire Veterinary Center for Wildlife, said the center would focus on four “tenets”: rescue, repair, rehabilitation and education, and that most vehicle traffic would be low and intermittent. “On a day that a surgery is required, there would be a veterinarian, most likely two technicians,” Dutton said. For rehabilitation, volunteers would rotate through shifts; presenters estimated often one volunteer on site for four-hour shifts. Dutton said the center aims to return animals to the wild after treatment and to train other veterinary staff, and that occasional visiting veterinarians or students might increase staff presence for educational cases.

Engineer Kevin Leonard and project engineers described the driveway siting and sight-distance constraints along Goffstown Road. The project team said the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) granted the use and wetland-related relief needed to proceed and that the applicant plans to limit development to the 21-acre area shown in the ZBA exhibit. The applicant showed multiple driveway alternatives. Hooksett’s driveway standard defaults to the posted speed plus 5 mph (in the case presented: 30 mph posted → 35 mph) and an intersection sight-distance requirement of roughly 390 feet under Hooksett’s ordinance. The applicant said meeting the town’s 35 mph (intersection) sight-distance requirement would force a driveway alignment that impacts wetlands and buffers; engineers therefore asked whether the Planning Board’s practice would accept AASHTO stopping/intersection sight-distance measured to posted speed (30 mph) instead of the posted-speed-plus-5 rule the town’s ordinance describes.

Several board members said they found the argument persuasive. Member Mike Summers said he would be comfortable using the national AASHTO standard (30 mph → approximately 335 feet) rather than the town’s default 35-mph intersection sight-distance for this low-trip generator use. Member Paul Scarpetti and member Sheena Gilbert likewise said they would be willing to accept the AASHTO baseline for this project, noting the applicant had proposed mitigation to reduce wetland buffer impacts. Planning staff noted the hearing was conceptual and no formal site plan submittal or final driveway permit was before the board; full engineering and final plans will be required at site-plan stage.

No formal vote or waiver was taken at the March 3 concept discussion. The board’s comments were presented as guidance: applicants must return with a full plan set, refined driveway design, wetland resource documentation and any necessary conservation commission approvals before obtaining final Planning Board approvals or building permits.

Community and regulatory context: the property abuts town conservation land and includes wetlands; conservation commission staff told the board they had no objection to the concept as presented. The project team said they would try to minimize wetland buffer impacts and design the driveway and fire-truck turning radii to minimize retaining walls and fill where possible.

Next steps: the applicant was told to return with a complete site-plan submission and the detailed driveway design; any future relief the applicant seeks from the town’s sight-distance rule will be considered in the context of the formal site-plan process and engineering memos from the town consultants.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Hooksett - Planning Board - Mar 03, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Hooksett Planning Board on March 3 heard a concept presentation for the New Hampshire Veterinary Center for Wildlife at 30 Goffstown Road (Map 22, Lot 4).","taxTitle","Hooksett, Merrimack County , New Hampshire","taxId",68560,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6653183,"Planning board accepts jurisdiction for Eagle’s Nest site plan, asks for design clarifications and continues review",1905,7383000,9288000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2485517-9b01fe1228be7d3ed22b2fcbb1413051&start=7383&end=9288","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2485517-9b01fe1228be7d3ed22b2fcbb1413051/thumbnail_7383000.jpg","/articles/6653183/Hooksett/Merrimack-County/New-Hampshire/Planning-board-accepts-jurisdiction-for-Eagles-Nest-site-plan-asks-for-design-clarifications-and-continues-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6653183-36007db06f477ed1c49e662127a2fd78/orig.mp4?Expires=1771198344&Signature=VdK5ZlwhBtcSMttjhV1ZIVkqkhpvdpIWrosfohPToG~CvRSLfV7hZbqLem8wkcnUslmFO6RQ8biPEgS4rbE6U8yY2y-3OJQwELHUn2vBuZea-w5f-FqwhbESNkTB41BNum2IhXAPP3hElhD-SwHCAxdRbPv55A05NugwQ5zKOjbXZrVfG-HKS5gDzE5ho1QhG3rPnDGYMbwS3J8ShfISdZfFD9uj5~zbbp24o1-zo6gjZfxUQlYjotlR7HjyE7S9419sf6paLahTgCyENvFZxqypNhsPlVi-JTgq33S~tLJJB9aPah7Qg-UOYt24RC2HYe80lgUYxLRZhOg-hXB4rA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Hooksett Planning Board accepted jurisdiction on March 3 for a commercial site‑plan application at 1501 Hooksett Road (Eagle’s Nest), a project that would add 14 new cabin lodging units and a storage building, convert parts of the existing main building for three additional lodging units and laundry, and connect the property to public water and sewer. Meridian Land Services engineer Fred Caspersen presented the plan and described the proposed sewer extension to an existing manhole at the Shannon Road/Hooksett Road intersection and a water connection to the frontage main. The applicant intends to decommission the existing septic once public connections are available; the existing well would remain for irrigation.

Town staff and TRC comments

Town staff noted engineering comments from the technical review committee. The applicant proposed two surface infiltration basins for stormwater attenuation and treatment; TRC asked for spot grades in the grading plan, referenced compliance with federal, state and local standards, and requested a turning‑radius/turning‑movement depiction showing parking striping for maneuvering. The state Department of Transportation has an outstanding driveway permit amendment application for the site; the board recorded DOT review as pending.

Fire and utilities

The Hooksett Fire Department requested additional hydrant coverage; the applicant said they would address hydrant location requirements. The applicant indicated the new cabins would use mini‑split heating systems and the existing cabins and main building would receive utility upgrades as part of the site improvements. There was discussion about the timing of utility work: the applicant said the intent is to limit downtime of tenant services during the transition to public sewer and water, but the work will require short periods when individual buildings are switched from on‑site systems to the new utilities.

Public comment and board direction

A representative of the adjacent Granite Hill community (Cedar Management) said the association generally supports reusing the site but asked for clarity on tenant displacement during construction and expressed concern about parking and temporary loss of services. Board members requested more landscaping, added street trees along the frontage, and color/material palettes for new cabins to match the existing character. The town engineer also requested refining grading spot elevations and clarifying retaining and foundation details for cabins with substantial fill.

Procedural outcome

The board found no regional impact and accepted jurisdiction for the application by roll call. After asking for the outstanding items (landscape plan that meets Performance Zone standards or a written waiver request, hydrant plan in coordination with fire department, DOT driveway permit resolution and grading/parking clarifications), the board voted to continue the public hearing to a date certain so the applicant can supply the missing materials and address TRC comments.

Next steps

Applicant will submit revised landscape, grading, hydrant and parking details and coordinate with DOT on the driveway permit; the Planning Department will circulate TRC memos and schedule the continuation date.","The board accepted jurisdiction for the Eagle’s Nest (1501 Hooksett Road) site‑plan application and asked applicants to return with landscaping, hydrant and DOT driveway clarifications.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6653188,"Planning board continues Granite Woods subdivision hearing after public concern over Hackett Hill access and TIF implications",5100,1479000,6579000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2485517-9b01fe1228be7d3ed22b2fcbb1413051&start=1479&end=6579","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2485517-9b01fe1228be7d3ed22b2fcbb1413051/thumbnail_1479000.jpg","/articles/6653188/Hooksett/Merrimack-County/New-Hampshire/Planning-board-continues-Granite-Woods-subdivision-hearing-after-public-concern-over-Hackett-Hill-access-and-TIF-implications","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6653188-2cbee51d27789a7c3f9d304336691e05/orig.mp4?Expires=1771198344&Signature=n90SRezdD41jfxHgAkAxjpGaz6UClFDb5i5cgKnYIfHIM-1r-J5aovtb1dmMtnPlq5sxzhhyO000618FRUK0f62aFFlht58EL3bxJztCEXu89L4ieFQvhskwuTVqsJg-iVVxUTRWevQyFqLmdcTe~NEKtxQkYdm8qae6OTRXvZYW9n1VReISMDQRMjOlgxikKVzPTZnOA14fDt0ISm7oYxG5A0sITEHVgLPWu8Qb4gqLzpOgf5rpqaA8hm6Yt2ETXmiZKgMFtsX4vnjg~hm~zDMItx48qPpKqtoMcd~-KhR1x58AVNbgX~~gH-8bgexV3LRiY5w-K-NT1I1NguxasQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Hooksett Planning Board accepted jurisdiction on March 3 for Granite Woods LLC’s application to create a two‑lot subdivision and land condominium for the Lot 7 master site (approximately 60 acres) and a 10.29‑acre parcel shown as proposed Lot 72. The application described phasing for a large industrial building (a 100,000‑square‑foot first phase within an ultimately proposed 500,000‑square‑foot development), and said the subdivision and condo documents are intended to facilitate staged mortgage financing for phased construction.

Attorney John Cronin and project manager Rich Whitehouse (VHB) led the presentation and listed five waiver requests tied to driveway geometry, landscaping and deferred submittals. The board held a lengthy public hearing and public-comment period that drew multiple abutters and neighborhood residents who raised strong concerns about the proposed driveway access off Hackett Hill Road, potential wall heights, wetland impacts and the implications for the town’s TIF (tax increment financing) district.

Key technical points and board discussion

- Jurisdiction: The board voted to accept jurisdiction on the subdivision application (motion by Member Jim Sullivan; seconded; roll-call recorded). Several members later recused themselves from specific items as required by disclosure rules.
- Driveway sight distance and location: Engineers said meeting Hooksett’s default commercial intersection sight‑distance (posted speed +5 mph) would require a driveway location that intrudes into wetland buffer and would likely need retaining walls. They presented multiple driveway profiles and argued the alternative of using AASHTO (national) sight‑distance at the posted speed (30 mph) would reduce buffer impact but still meet a recognized engineering standard. Several board members and staff urged minimizing wetland impacts and noted the Zoning Board of Adjustment had already granted relief for wetlands and a residential‑use variance for commercial use on part of the property.
- Waivers: The applicant requested several waivers, including a reduced 2% grade distance for the first portion of a driveway, modified centerline radii for horizontal curves (to minimize wetland buffer impacts), and deferral of landscaping and condominium documents to a later submittal stage. The applicant also requested limited monumentation waivers for corners falling in wetland.
- Public concerns: Neighbors described repeated traffic accidents at the Hackett Hill curve, potential 20‑foot exposed retaining walls that could face abutters, groundwater and blasting concerns, and uncertainty whether future uses of the rear parcel would be residential, commercial or industrial. Several speakers urged that the board not approve a new Hackett Hill driveway until the town had confirmed traffic safety and long‑term servicing (water, sewer) plans; residents also asked about the legal status of historic easements on parts of the site.
- TIF and finance: Several board members asked whether subdividing and condominiumizing portions of Lot 7 could complicate the TIF district financing; the applicant said the financing approach (carving out parcels for mortgage purposes) would help enable phased construction and argued it did not reduce the town’s ability to realize incremental tax revenue under the TIF agreement. The applicant noted it had invested nearly $8 million in off‑site water and sewer work to enable development.

Votes and procedural outcome

- The board first voted to accept jurisdiction of the application (motion made, seconded; roll‑call recorded). The board then held a procedural vote on “regional impact” (pursuant to RSA 36:56); a motion to find potential for regional impact failed (board voted no). After extended public comment and discussion, the Planning Board voted to continue the public hearing to March 17, 2025, to allow the applicant to refine plans and address board and public concerns (motion passed by roll call).

What the board asked from the applicant

The board and staff asked the applicant to provide: a more detailed driveway design that minimizes wetland buffer impacts; clearer condominium documents or a plan for submitting condominium documents; greater clarity about intended uses on the rear parcel; engineering details about proposed retaining walls and any construction easements; and additional coordination with the town engineer and conservation commission. Several board members said they would prefer the applicant show access options that avoid Hackett Hill access before the board grants final subdivision approval.

Context and next steps

Granite Woods LLC will return to the Planning Board on March 17 with revised materials, and the board will continue its review. The applicant was informed that final approval will require full site‑plan details, condo documents or a waiver justification, and coordination with the town engineer and legal counsel on TIF and condominium arrangements.","The board accepted jurisdiction for Granite Woods LLC's two-lot subdivision and land‑condominium concept for Lot 7 but after extensive public comment deferred final action to March 17, 2025. Residents and several board members raised safety, wetland and tax-increment-financing (TIF) concerns about a proposed driveway off Hackett Hill.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6653173,"Votes at a glance: Hooksett Planning Board, March 3, 2025",8910,162000,9072000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2485517-9b01fe1228be7d3ed22b2fcbb1413051&start=162&end=9072","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2485517-9b01fe1228be7d3ed22b2fcbb1413051/thumbnail_162000.jpg","/articles/6653173/Hooksett/Merrimack-County/New-Hampshire/Votes-at-a-glance-Hooksett-Planning-Board-March-3-2025","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6653173-93a91a972b557a5fe7c1922ae5d1d285/orig.mp4?Expires=1771198344&Signature=mfLneamWA-sWFGc0LW08WHd6WOmstZscpXLFVem~Bmhj3nA9xLw0n1wR9N0JrmxJr76BmBO481fuWasSth60OisvYteY1~-dkwiVSW14x3RxIW2H1KMORs4KVeJe8iGHXBuLU5lqdCzz4z0FGCtfBiYrbNvGDOnVP366q2lxfSyJLuEOknOwMKSTDrUiyep1LNzrPuBGXKTR2fDObSv~XgssjtvH97Da504uevvy5WvXfqCOjAM-tSRom5jA50ugXXeqr5eiI2d7cKP7l3kRo2lrOYnmtS9609EsX91xi1jFQCJV8NEJRtuIoGtEQ1L6x7FQqkgRg8ELbQrz3Ez~hA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Key votes recorded by the Hooksett Planning Board on March 3, 2025 (roll‑call tallies as recorded in meeting minutes):

1) Minutes approval (meeting of February 3): Motion to approve minutes — unanimous yes (roll call recorded).

2) New Hampshire Veterinary Center for Wildlife: Concept presentation only; no votes taken.

3) Granite Woods (Map 17 Lot 7 and Lot 72):
- Motion to accept jurisdiction of the subdivision application — passed (roll call: majority yes; one recorded no by alternate and some recusal noted).
- Motion to find potential for regional impact (RSA 36:56) — failed (board voted no, unanimous).
- Motion to continue the public hearing to March 17, 2025 — passed (roll call recorded unanimous yes).

4) Eagle’s Nest (1501 Hooksett Road):
- Motion to accept jurisdiction — passed (roll call unanimous yes).
- Motion to find potential for regional impact — failed (board voted no, unanimous).
- Motion to continue public hearing pending TRC and DOT items — passed (roll call unanimous yes).

5) Macy subdivision (Map 5 Lot 10, four lots):
- Motion to accept jurisdiction and find application complete — passed (roll call unanimous yes).
- Motion to approve subdivision with conditions (shared-driveway paving, erosion control measures and standard pre-construction/pre-CO conditions) — passed (roll call unanimous yes).
- Motion to assess impact fees for the primary lot (school $19,912; public safety $5,304; recreation $2,780; roadway $5,680; total $33,676) — passed (roll call unanimous yes).

How to read these results: All votes above were recorded as roll‑call votes in the Planning Board minutes. For projects with continuances, the board requested applicants to return with specified materials (revised driveway alignments, condominium documents, TRC responses, DOT permit responses and landscaping) before any final approvals.

If you need the full roll‑call record or the official meeting minutes, contact the Hooksett Planning Department.","Summary of roll‑call votes taken at the Hooksett Planning Board meeting on March 3, including minutes approval, jurisdictional acceptances, continuances and the Macy subdivision decision.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6653178,"Planning board conditionally approves four‑lot subdivision for Macy property on Goffstown Road with paving and erosion conditions",3692,7978000,11670000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2485517-9b01fe1228be7d3ed22b2fcbb1413051&start=7978&end=11670","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2485517-9b01fe1228be7d3ed22b2fcbb1413051/thumbnail_7978000.jpg","/articles/6653178/Hooksett/Merrimack-County/New-Hampshire/Planning-board-conditionally-approves-fourlot-subdivision-for-Macy-property-on-Goffstown-Road-with-paving-and-erosion-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6653178-54891be8809c6a3904c09e7c1353cc77/orig.mp4?Expires=1771198344&Signature=gucJ7WG-RD1gMwDQHb2ib-1D5VaNmanZUQDMmcmB4SpsODwcZb2oEXZP2uGWqeY6qEQ5tkrEwvEXaPEnlmk96hCym-yB1iidVqkMAZ~-Z9cyuYaJ-B-GYMDOJGA2N4V1OZNwYr130rD0jSaKN12xgtMgQqWWeBoAWcGaCY5EOJvjlwF1jRyEOps6hcouMVE6OTky3skW~pvcXGpdPW-vKomcqRJKMnEmlczzBXGFjqAIgFrXcYpr0GIxJ3h9j8V~KwQs0qqmqMYaaZOnygDvBnu9w-uHQQNlQt3p0gebccJbqqSpuiVTNyqxoX4ibgcrxEjOZ4kEyZCP46Hd7iUdcA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Planning Board voted on March 3 to accept jurisdiction and conditionally approve a four‑lot subdivision for a parcel on Goffstown Road (Map 5 Lot 10) submitted by Lance Macy. The property is roughly 8.84 acres with 943 feet of frontage in the MDR (medium density residential) zone; the proposal divides the parcel into four single‑family lots that meet Hooksett’s dimensional requirements.

Key points

- Jurisdiction and completeness: The board found the application complete and accepted jurisdiction by roll call vote.
- Well/septic demonstration: The applicant’s submission showed proposed well radii and septic areas to demonstrate statutory compliance for single‑family lots; staff clarified that labeled “proposed wells” are illustrative for subdivision review and final well locations will be established at building permit if applicants select specific building designs.
- Shared driveway and DOT: The plan proposes a maximum of three accesses to the state highway (per state rule) and uses a common driveway configuration (two lots sharing a driveway, two with individual drives). The board conditioned approval on paving the portion of the common driveway to avoid maintenance disputes between future owners and requested erosion control measures for construction of driveways and lots.

Votes and conditions

- Motion to approve the subdivision and findings passed by roll call; conditions recorded included: monumentation as required, paving of the shared drive segment, a water pollution/erosion control plan for driveway construction, and standard conditions prior to construction and prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy. The board also recorded the applicant’s impact fee calculation and voted to assess impact fees for the primary lot per the board’s schedule (total amount recorded in meeting minutes). The board required the applicant to obtain the New Hampshire DOT driveway permit and to satisfy town engineer comments.

What happens next

The applicant will record the subdivision plan conditioned on the items above and pursue individual building permits for each new lot; final well and septic siting will be resolved at building-permit stage. The Planning Department will monitor compliance with the conditions recorded in the approval.","The board accepted jurisdiction and approved a four‑lot subdivision (Map 5 Lot 10) submitted by Lance Macy with conditions requiring paving of the shared driveway, erosion protection during driveway construction, and procedural items (monumentation, final paperwork). The board also recorded the impact‑fee tally for the primary lot.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Planning board hears concept plan for New Hampshire Veterinary Center for Wildlife in Goffstown Road area

Planning board accepts jurisdiction for Eagle’s Nest site plan, asks for design clarifications and continues review

Planning board continues Granite Woods subdivision hearing after public concern over Hackett Hill access and TIF implications

Votes at a glance: Hooksett Planning Board, March 3, 2025

Planning board conditionally approves four‑lot subdivision for Macy property on Goffstown Road with paving and erosion conditions