Minnesota proposes term limits for governor and lieutenant governor

March 03, 2025 | Senate Bills, Introduced Bills, 2025 Bills, Minnesota Legislation Bills, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Minnesota proposes term limits for governor and lieutenant governor
Minnesota lawmakers are making a bold move to reshape the state's political landscape with the introduction of Senate Bill 2143, which proposes term limits for the governor and lieutenant governor. If passed, this constitutional amendment would restrict these high-ranking officials to two consecutive terms, a significant shift aimed at promoting fresh leadership and accountability in state governance.

The bill, introduced on March 3, 2025, by Senators Rarick, Johnson, Draheim, Green, and Gruenhagen, seeks to amend Article V, Section 2 of the Minnesota Constitution. Under the proposed changes, candidates for governor and lieutenant governor would be limited to two four-year terms, with the amendment set to be presented to voters during the 2026 general election. The question posed to the electorate will be straightforward: "Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to place a limit of two terms on the offices of governor and lieutenant governor beginning in 2030?"

Supporters of the bill argue that term limits could invigorate Minnesota's political scene by allowing new voices and ideas to emerge, potentially reducing the risk of entrenched political power. Proponents believe that this change could lead to more responsive governance and increased public trust in elected officials.

However, the proposal is not without its critics. Opponents raise concerns that term limits could hinder experienced leaders from continuing their work, potentially destabilizing ongoing initiatives and policies. They argue that voters should have the ultimate say in whether to re-elect their leaders, rather than imposing restrictions that could limit choice.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, its implications could resonate beyond Minnesota. Experts suggest that if successful, this amendment could inspire similar movements in other states, reflecting a growing national conversation about political accountability and reform. The outcome of the 2026 vote will be pivotal, as it could redefine the future of leadership in Minnesota and set a precedent for governance across the country.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI