Minnesota bans mercury in alkaline and button cell batteries effective January 2027

March 03, 2025 | Senate Bills, Introduced Bills, 2025 Bills, Minnesota Legislation Bills, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Minnesota bans mercury in alkaline and button cell batteries effective January 2027
The Minnesota State Legislature has introduced Senate Bill 2077, a significant piece of legislation aimed at addressing environmental and public health concerns related to mercury in batteries. Introduced on March 3, 2025, the bill seeks to prohibit the sale and distribution of certain types of batteries containing mercury, thereby reducing the potential for environmental contamination and health risks associated with mercury exposure.

Key provisions of the bill include a ban on alkaline manganese batteries that contain mercury, nonrechargeable button cell batteries with more than 25 milligrams of mercury, and dry cell batteries featuring a mercuric oxide electrode. This legislation is set to take effect on January 1, 2027, allowing time for manufacturers and retailers to adjust to the new regulations.

The bill has sparked notable discussions among lawmakers and environmental advocates. Proponents argue that the ban is a necessary step toward protecting public health and the environment, as mercury is a toxic substance that can have severe health implications, particularly for vulnerable populations. Critics, however, have raised concerns about the potential economic impact on battery manufacturers and the availability of alternative products.

In addition to the mercury ban, Senate Bill 2077 includes amendments to the state parks and trails plate program, increasing the minimum annual contribution required for special plates from $60 to $70. This change aims to bolster funding for state parks and trails, enhancing recreational opportunities for residents and visitors alike.

The implications of this bill are significant, as it not only addresses environmental health issues but also promotes funding for state parks, which are vital for Minnesota's outdoor recreation and tourism sectors. Experts suggest that the successful implementation of this legislation could serve as a model for other states looking to tackle similar environmental challenges.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, stakeholders will be closely monitoring its progress and potential amendments, with the hope that it will ultimately lead to a healthier environment and enhanced recreational resources for all Minnesotans.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI