During a recent public hearing held by the Connecticut House of Representatives Appropriations Committee, the urgent need for increased funding for the Communication Advocacy Network (CAN) took center stage. Advocates and clients passionately voiced their experiences, highlighting the critical services provided to DeafBlind individuals and the pressing need for financial support to sustain and expand these services.

Maria D'Addario, a DeafBlind resident, shared her personal journey, emphasizing how CAN's services have transformed her life. "Before I had CAN, I faced constant misunderstandings and struggles with transportation," she explained. "Now, I feel safe and supported, allowing me to navigate my community more effectively." D'Addario's testimony underscored the importance of having trained support service providers (SSPs) who facilitate communication and mobility for individuals with dual sensory loss.

Martin Greenberg, who has been DeafBlind since his twenties, echoed this sentiment, detailing his reliance on CAN for essential services that enable him to manage daily tasks like grocery shopping and medical appointments. "Without their support, I would not be here today," he stated, calling for increased grant funding to enhance CAN's capabilities.

Patricia Wilson, a former employee of CAN, noted a significant rise in demand for services, with the number of DeafBlind consumers increasing from five to 26 in recent years. She urged the committee to support Bill 6864, which proposes doubling funding from $100,000 to $200,000 to meet the growing needs of the community.

Luisa Glasgow Soboleski, president of the Connecticut Association of the Deaf, reinforced the call for funding, stressing that without it, many DeafBlind and elderly individuals would continue to live in isolation without access to vital communication and support services.

The testimonies presented during the hearing painted a vivid picture of the challenges faced by DeafBlind individuals in Connecticut and the indispensable role that CAN plays in their lives. As advocates continue to push for increased funding, the committee's decision will be crucial in determining the future of these essential services.