Become a Founder Member Now!

Mead County Planning Board candidates discuss community growth and ordinance challenges

December 17, 2024 | Meade County, South Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Mead County Planning Board candidates discuss community growth and ordinance challenges
The Meade County Commission meeting on December 17, 2024, showcased a significant discussion surrounding the appointment of new planning board members, highlighting the candidates' backgrounds and their visions for the county's future.

Retired military officer and substitute teacher, Mr. Pauling, opened the session with a compelling introduction. He emphasized his commitment to serving the community and his belief in Meade County's potential for growth, likening it to the rapid development seen in Colorado Springs over the past decades. Pauling expressed his desire to contribute positively to the county's trajectory, stating, "I can pretty much give a very objective opinion... other than doing a good job for my fellow citizens."

During the Q&A, Pauling addressed concerns about his availability for monthly meetings, reassuring the commission that his role as a substitute teacher allows him the flexibility to attend. He acknowledged the challenges of balancing individual property rights with community needs, stating, "You're never gonna make everybody happy, but you should do the best you can."

Following Pauling, Shauna Schmidt, a long-time resident and administrative officer at the Fort Meade VA Hospital, presented her case for reappointment to the planning board. With over four years of experience, Schmidt highlighted the complexities of navigating local ordinances and covenants, particularly when they conflict with community interests. She noted, "There have been issues where ordinances don't really apply for certain situations... it's very hard because you're trying to accommodate both sides."

The discussions underscored the ongoing challenges faced by the commission, particularly regarding zoning issues and the enforcement of local covenants. As the meeting concluded, both candidates expressed their eagerness to contribute to the county's development and address the pressing issues that arise from its growth.

The commission's decision on these appointments will be pivotal in shaping Meade County's future, as it grapples with the balance between development and community standards.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting