The Connecticut State Legislature has introduced House Bill 6487, aimed at evaluating the costs associated with providing public versus private services to individuals with intellectual disabilities. The bill, proposed by Representative Dathan of the 142nd District, seeks to enhance oversight and accountability in the allocation of resources for these vulnerable populations.

The primary provision of House Bill 6487 mandates the Auditors of Public Accounts, in conjunction with the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management, to conduct a comprehensive review of the financial implications of public and private service delivery models for individuals with intellectual disabilities. This review is expected to culminate in a report submitted to the joint standing committee of the General Assembly responsible for government oversight by February 15, 2026.

The introduction of this bill comes amid ongoing discussions about the adequacy and efficiency of services provided to individuals with intellectual disabilities in Connecticut. Proponents argue that a thorough analysis will help identify potential cost savings and improve service delivery, while critics express concerns about the potential for privatization, fearing it may lead to reduced quality of care.

The implications of House Bill 6487 extend beyond fiscal considerations; it touches on broader social issues regarding the treatment and support of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Experts suggest that the findings of the review could influence future policy decisions and funding allocations, potentially reshaping the landscape of services available to this community.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, stakeholders from various sectors, including advocacy groups and service providers, are expected to weigh in, highlighting the importance of ensuring that any changes prioritize the well-being of individuals with intellectual disabilities. The outcome of this bill could have lasting effects on how services are structured and funded in Connecticut, making it a significant topic of discussion in the upcoming legislative sessions.