[{"_1":2,"_115":-5,"_116":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,85,95,105],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6693795,"mediaKeyId","2393291-793d0dc8ca0caf3592d616b787afcee6","parentId",2393291,"title","Board tables advertising policy, forms subcommittee; approves Contour-funded billboard plan for March review","audioSeconds",4459,"startMs",719070,"endMs",5178360,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2393291-793d0dc8ca0caf3592d616b787afcee6&start=719&end=5178","thumbnailUrl","https://d352y6ypj4mjo3.cloudfront.net/AudioPlaceholder.png","articleUrl","/articles/6693795/Utah/Board-tables-advertising-policy-forms-subcommittee-approves-Contour-funded-billboard-plan-for-March-review","mediaUrl","author","Grand County Airport Board","date","2025-01-06T16:00:00Z","article","The Grand County Airport Board unanimously voted Jan. 6 to table a draft advertising policy and form a subcommittee to rewrite the document, and separately authorized using Contour Airlines' sponsorship funds to place a Contour-branded banner on an unused county billboard, with final language and a short contract to be worked out by March.

Board members said the draft policy in the packet gave broad discretion to the airport director on advertiser approval and lacked language about oversight, digital signage and how advertising leases or fee-for-service agreements would be handled. Several board members said they wanted more board review and input rather than leaving sole authority to the director.

Bill moved and Alex seconded a motion to table the policy and create a subcommittee of board members to draft stronger language. Bill, Bill (board member), Jason and Randy volunteered to serve on the ad-policy subcommittee.

Separately, the board authorized staff to use Contour's annual marketing dollars to pay for a banner on an underused billboard at the airport's north entrance, with board members asking that a simple contract or written agreement be prepared to document that the airport is using Contour funds for airport advertising. The board amended a motion to postpone installation until March so the banner design can reflect any new Contour routes and so an agreement can be prepared; the motion passed unanimously.

Board members and staff emphasized two points: that the draft advertising policy should address digital signage and how the board wishes to exercise oversight, and that any one-year use of the county-owned billboard should be documented in a simple contract to avoid fairness complaints if a private party later seeks the space. Tammy said Contour pays $25,000 a year and that the funds are intended to promote flights from Canyonlands Regional Airport. The board asked airport staff and county counsel to prepare a brief agreement and to revisit the billboard installation at the March retreat.","mediaType","Audio","parentTitle","Regular Meeting - AB 2025.01.06 - Audio","oneSentenceSummary","The Grand County Airport Board voted to table a proposed advertising policy and form a subcommittee to redraft it, and separately approved a plan to use Contour Airlines' marketing funds to place a Contour-branded banner on an unused county billboard, pending a brief contract and March review.","taxTitle","Grand County Airport Board, Grand County Boards and Commissions, Grand County, Utah","taxId",75039,"location","Utah","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":50,"_51":82,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":83,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":84,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},6693800,"Airport board accepts revised hangar spacing language, forwards to county attorney",435,261820,697760,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2393291-793d0dc8ca0caf3592d616b787afcee6&start=261&end=697","/articles/6693800/Utah/Airport-board-accepts-revised-hangar-spacing-language-forwards-to-county-attorney","The Grand County Airport Board voted unanimously Jan. 6 to accept revised language for the airport's minimum standards that clarify required spacing between hangars and minimum square footage requirements and to forward the revised text to the county attorney for review.

Board members said the changes incorporate suggested text from the zoning administrator and from building engineering and planning and zoning staff. Tammy (airport staff) displayed an emailed version of the proposed edits during the meeting.

Board member Bill made the motion to accept the updates as they appear in the emailed version, Jason seconded and the motion passed without dissent. Tammy said the next step is to have the county attorney review the plain copy before it is finalized.

Board members said the edits were limited in scope and consistent with prior discussions, and no further substantive changes were proposed at the meeting. The board did not approve a final policy document; it approved only the motion to accept the revised language and move it to legal review.

The changes discussed included inserting a reference to building engineering and planning and zoning in the hangar-size language and spelling corrections to the minutes excerpt included in the packet. No code citations or state statutes were introduced during the discussion.

The board did not vote on final ordinance adoption; the county attorney review is the next formal step before any formal adoption or posting.","The Grand County Airport Board voted unanimously to accept edits to the airport's minimum-standards language for hangar spacing and minimum square footage and to send the revised text to the county attorney for legal review.",{"_33":86,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":87,"_41":88,"_43":89,"_45":90,"_47":91,"_49":50,"_51":92,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":93,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":94,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},6693778,"Board approves minutes, federal civil-rights plans and a specialized lease renewal",451,5596870,6048190,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2393291-793d0dc8ca0caf3592d616b787afcee6&start=5596&end=6048","/articles/6693778/Utah/Board-approves-minutes-federal-civil-rights-plans-and-a-specialized-lease-renewal","At its Jan. 6 meeting the Grand County Airport Board completed several routine approvals: it approved minutes from Dec. 2 and the Dec. 9 special budget meeting; it approved three FAA-required documents (Title VI nondiscrimination procedures, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) procedures and a Community Participation Plan (CPP)); and it approved renewal of an existing lease with ARINC (a long-standing aviation communications equipment provider).

Board members said the Title VI/DBE/CPP materials were largely standard required forms the FAA has begun enforcing for commercial airports, and the county attorney had reviewed the materials. Tammy said the airport will post required nondiscrimination notices and provide translated assistance where needed.

The ARINC lease renewal was described as a specialized, single-source service providing radio-communications equipment and antenna space on the terminal. The board approved the renewal as presented; no rent change was proposed and staff said the arrangement does not compete with other terminal space because the service is specialized.

All items passed unanimously; no further substantive debate occurred at the meeting. The board recorded the votes as approvals to forward the FAA documents to the County Commission for final acceptance and to complete the ARINC renewal process.","The Grand County Airport Board approved previous meeting minutes, adopted required FAA Title VI/DBE/CPP documents for the airport to remain eligible for federal funding, and renewed a specialized equipment lease with ARINC.",{"_33":96,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":97,"_41":98,"_43":99,"_45":100,"_47":101,"_49":50,"_51":102,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":103,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":104,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},6693784,"Garage proposal not approved; board asks staff, planning to meet with applicant to evaluate parking-area option",1010,3595030,4605300,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2393291-793d0dc8ca0caf3592d616b787afcee6&start=3595&end=4605","/articles/6693784/Utah/Garage-proposal-not-approved-board-asks-staff-planning-to-meet-with-applicant-to-evaluate-parking-area-option","An applicant seeking to place a downsized set of aircraft garages in the airport's parking expansion area did not receive board approval Jan. 6. The board asked airport staff to meet with the zoning administrator and the applicant to address planning, setback and soils questions before taking further action.

Bill Prather presented a revised layout that he said would reduce the number of garage units and that, in his view, placing units in the parking-expansion area could be financially viable. Tammy read an email from the zoning administrator, who said the proposed location \"is not in compliance with the ALP or the AMP\" and warned that hangars in that location could affect future parking expansion; she also noted grading and drainage planning would be required.

Board members emphasized the need to coordinate with planning and engineering: they asked Tammy to meet with the zoning administrator and report back. The applicant agreed to provide soils testing if staff wished; the board advised additional soil investigation and coordination with planning prior to a future board decision.

No vote was taken on a lease or relocation; the board's direction was procedural: staff is to meet with planning staff and the applicant and, if warranted, return to the board with options. The board did not commit to any final siting or lease terms at the meeting.","An applicant seeking to place aircraft garages in the airport's parking-expansion area was told the board will not decide until staff and the zoning administrator meet with the applicant; planning issues and soils questions must be resolved first.",{"_33":106,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":107,"_41":108,"_43":109,"_45":110,"_47":111,"_49":50,"_51":112,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":113,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":114,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},6693790,"Board accepts state revitalization grant for landscaping and dumpster enclosure, defers final placement to March retreat",743,2767590,3510770,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2393291-793d0dc8ca0caf3592d616b787afcee6&start=2767&end=3510","/articles/6693790/Utah/Board-accepts-state-revitalization-grant-for-landscaping-and-dumpster-enclosure-defers-final-placement-to-March-retreat","The Grand County Airport Board voted Jan. 6 to accept a state revitalization grant to fund landscaping improvements at the airport entrance and construction of a dumpster enclosure, with an estimated grant amount of $46,500. The board approved the award and directed staff to return in March with a final proposed location and design.

Tammy said the grant opportunity came from a UDOT revitalization program that makes funds available to support front-of-property improvements; she described the program as having up to $100,000 available annually. The board discussed alternate locations for the dumpster enclosure and whether the structure should be a privacy fence or a masonry enclosure. Tammy said much of the work would be done in-house and that the grant does not require a county match.

Some tenants and board members raised concerns about convenience for hangar tenants and lighting; Andrea (airport staff) noted the existing dumpster location is well lit and convenient for nights and for landside technicians. After debate, the board voted to accept the grant for $46,500, to approve spending the funds on landscaping and an enclosure, and to continue discussion about final dumpster placement at the March 3 retreat. The motion included a fallback option allowing the project to proceed without the enclosure if the board preferred to remove that item and proceed with landscaping only.

Tammy said permanent bids were not yet solicited; the airport expects to do some work in-house and to obtain estimates before a full contract. The approved scope is landscaping of the entrance hill and construction of an enclosure for the dumpster near the terminal; specific materials and final footprint were left for later discussion and possible redrafting to accommodate tenant needs.","The board accepted a UDOT revitalization grant proposal to fund entrance landscaping and a new dumpster enclosure (approximately $46,500), approved the award and agreed to finalize the dumpster's exact site at the March retreat.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board tables advertising policy, forms subcommittee; approves Contour-funded billboard plan for March review

Airport board accepts revised hangar spacing language, forwards to county attorney

Board approves minutes, federal civil-rights plans and a specialized lease renewal

Garage proposal not approved; board asks staff, planning to meet with applicant to evaluate parking-area option

Board accepts state revitalization grant for landscaping and dumpster enclosure, defers final placement to March retreat