Washington establishes pilot program for prescribed fire damage claims

February 27, 2025 | 2025 Introduced Bills, Senate, 2025 Bills, Washington Legislation Bills, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Washington establishes pilot program for prescribed fire damage claims
Senate Bill 5491, introduced in Washington on February 27, 2025, aims to establish a framework for reimbursing individuals and entities affected by prescribed fires and cultural burns conducted under approved plans. The bill seeks to address the growing concerns over property and economic damages resulting from these controlled burns, which are often necessary for land management and ecological restoration.

Key provisions of the bill include the eligibility criteria for claims, which must be submitted by individuals who have suffered damages due to prescribed fires or cultural burns that were executed by certified burn managers or cultural fire practitioners. The bill specifies that claims related to damages caused by criminal or negligent acts are not eligible for reimbursement. The maximum reimbursement amount is capped at $2 million per claim, contingent upon the availability of specific funding.

The bill also mandates collaboration between the office of risk management, the department of natural resources, and various stakeholders, including the Washington prescribed fire council and cultural fire practitioners, to develop guidelines for the pilot program and manage the reimbursement account. This collaboration aims to ensure that the claims process is transparent and efficient, with established procedures for submission and prioritization of claims.

Debate surrounding Senate Bill 5491 has highlighted concerns about the potential financial implications for the state, particularly regarding the funding of the reimbursement account. Critics argue that the bill could lead to increased liability for the state, while supporters emphasize the importance of supporting land management practices that benefit the environment and reduce wildfire risks.

The significance of this bill lies in its potential to balance ecological needs with economic protections for individuals affected by prescribed burns. Experts suggest that if implemented effectively, the bill could encourage more landowners to engage in responsible burning practices, ultimately contributing to better forest management and reduced wildfire hazards.

As the legislative process continues, stakeholders will be closely monitoring the discussions and amendments to ensure that the final version of the bill addresses both environmental and economic concerns effectively. The outcome of Senate Bill 5491 could set a precedent for how prescribed fire practices are managed and funded in Washington State.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI