The North Dakota State Legislature convened on February 25, 2025, to discuss several significant bills related to firearms and self-defense laws. The most notable discussion centered around House Bill 1326, which aimed to prevent convicted felons from claiming self-defense in situations involving the use of a weapon during a crime. Proponents argued that the bill would close a loophole that currently allows individuals, such as drug dealers, to claim self-defense after engaging in violent confrontations. The bill's supporters emphasized the need for accountability among felons who possess firearms illegally.

During the debate, Representative Heilman raised concerns about the implications of the bill for nonviolent felons who might find themselves in life-threatening situations. He questioned whether a nonviolent felon could use a firearm in self-defense, highlighting the potential for unjust outcomes if the bill were enacted. Other representatives echoed similar sentiments, arguing that the bill could strip individuals of their fundamental right to self-defense, particularly in scenarios where they might be defending themselves against imminent harm.

Ultimately, House Bill 1326 was put to a vote but failed, with 44 members voting in favor and 48 against. This outcome reflects the contentious nature of the discussions surrounding gun rights and self-defense laws in North Dakota.

In addition to House Bill 1326, the legislature also considered House Bill 1296, which sought to amend regulations regarding the requirement to produce a concealed carry license upon request by law enforcement. This bill was also met with opposition and ultimately failed with a vote of 21 in favor and 71 against.

Another significant proposal was House Bill 1411, which aimed to prohibit state agencies from adopting extreme risk protection laws, commonly known as red flag laws. This bill faced similar resistance and was rejected with a vote of 39 in favor and 53 against.

The session concluded with discussions on House Bill 1350, which sought to clarify definitions related to dangerous weapons in the context of business and trade. However, this bill also failed to pass, indicating a broader reluctance among legislators to alter existing firearm regulations.

Overall, the February 25 session highlighted the ongoing debates within the North Dakota legislature regarding gun rights, self-defense laws, and the balance between public safety and individual liberties. The failure of these bills suggests a complex landscape where lawmakers are grappling with the implications of firearm legislation in their state.