On February 25, 2025, the Arkansas Legislature introduced Senate Bill 117, a significant piece of legislation aimed at regulating the practice of naturopathic medicine within the state. The bill seeks to establish a formal framework for the licensing and practice of naturopathic physicians, defining their scope of practice and the therapies they may employ.

Key provisions of SB 117 include the definition of a "naturopathic physician" as an individual licensed to practice naturopathic medicine, which encompasses a variety of therapeutic approaches. These include joint mobilization, therapeutic exercise, and naturopathic manipulation, among others. The bill also outlines what constitutes "naturopathic therapy," which can involve the use of nutrition, homeopathic medicine, and therapeutic substances, such as vitamins and botanical medicines.

The introduction of this bill has sparked notable discussions among lawmakers and stakeholders. Proponents argue that formalizing the practice of naturopathic medicine will enhance patient access to alternative healthcare options and ensure that practitioners meet established educational and competency standards. The bill mandates that naturopathic physicians pass a national licensing examination administered by the North American Board of Naturopathic Examiners, which proponents believe will uphold the quality of care.

However, opposition has emerged from various medical associations and traditional healthcare providers who express concerns about the safety and efficacy of naturopathic treatments. Critics argue that the bill could lead to the promotion of unproven therapies and may blur the lines between conventional and alternative medicine, potentially putting patients at risk.

The economic implications of SB 117 are also noteworthy. By regulating naturopathic medicine, the state could see an increase in healthcare options, potentially reducing costs for patients seeking alternative treatments. However, the bill's passage could also lead to increased scrutiny and regulation of existing healthcare practices, which may impact traditional healthcare providers.

As the legislative process unfolds, experts suggest that the outcome of SB 117 could set a precedent for how alternative medicine is regulated in Arkansas and potentially influence similar legislative efforts in other states. The bill's future remains uncertain as it moves through committee discussions and debates, with stakeholders on both sides closely monitoring its progress.