County board approves $250 minimum pay for election judges under House Bill 586

February 24, 2025 | House Bills (Introduced), 2025 Bills, Maryland Legislation Bills Collections, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

County board approves $250 minimum pay for election judges under House Bill 586
On February 24, 2025, Maryland lawmakers introduced House Bill 586, a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing the compensation structure for election judges in the state. The bill seeks to address the growing need for qualified election judges by establishing minimum pay rates and incentivizing participation, particularly among returning judges and public school students.

The key provisions of House Bill 586 include a mandate for county governing bodies to allocate sufficient funding to meet the minimum compensation levels for election judges. Specifically, the bill stipulates that non-returning election judges must receive at least $250 for each day served during elections or early voting, while returning judges will earn a minimum of $350 per day. Additionally, the bill provides for compensation of $50 for each required training course completed by election judges, contingent upon their service on election days.

A notable aspect of the bill is its provision allowing public school students to earn service-learning hours towards graduation while also receiving compensation for their roles as election judges. This dual benefit aims to encourage youth participation in the electoral process, fostering civic engagement among younger generations.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, it has sparked discussions regarding its potential economic and social implications. Proponents argue that increased compensation will attract more individuals to serve as election judges, thereby enhancing the efficiency and integrity of the electoral process. Critics, however, have raised concerns about the financial burden on local governments and the sustainability of funding these increased wages.

The Maryland State Board is also set to reimburse local boards for a portion of the additional compensation paid to returning judges, which may alleviate some financial concerns for counties. As the bill moves forward, it will likely undergo further debates and amendments, reflecting the diverse perspectives on how best to support election administration in Maryland.

In summary, House Bill 586 represents a significant step towards improving the compensation framework for election judges in Maryland, with implications for voter engagement and the overall electoral process. The outcome of this bill could set a precedent for how states address the critical role of election judges in maintaining democratic integrity.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI