On February 22, 2025, the New Mexico House of Representatives introduced House Bill 260, aimed at regulating the use of physical restraint and seclusion techniques in public schools. The bill seeks to address concerns regarding the safety and well-being of students by establishing clear guidelines for when and how these techniques can be employed.

The primary provisions of House Bill 260 stipulate that physical restraint may only be used when a student's behavior poses an imminent danger of serious physical harm to themselves or others, and when less restrictive interventions have proven insufficient. The bill outlines specific types of restraints, including seclusion, chemical restraint, mechanical restraint, and prone restraint, emphasizing that these measures should be a last resort.

Key components of the bill include requirements for continuous visual monitoring of students during the use of restraint or seclusion, and mandates that only trained school employees may implement these techniques, except in emergency situations where immediate action is necessary. The bill also specifies that any restraint or seclusion must cease once the imminent danger has been resolved.

Debate surrounding House Bill 260 has highlighted concerns from various stakeholders, including educators, parents, and mental health advocates. Supporters argue that the bill provides necessary protections for students and staff, while opponents express worries about the potential for misuse and the psychological impact on students subjected to such measures.

The implications of this legislation are significant, as it seeks to balance the need for safety in schools with the rights and dignity of students. Experts suggest that the bill could lead to a reduction in the use of restraint and seclusion, promoting a more supportive educational environment. However, the effectiveness of the bill will depend on proper training and implementation in schools across New Mexico.

As House Bill 260 progresses through the legislative process, its outcomes will be closely monitored by advocates and educators alike, with potential ramifications for school policies and student welfare statewide.