North Dakota lawmakers push bill to ban sanctuary cities and enforce immigration cooperation

In a pivotal meeting held on February 20, 2025, the North Dakota State Legislature convened to discuss a proposed bill aimed at prohibiting sanctuary cities within the state. The atmosphere was charged with urgency as lawmakers examined the implications of this legislation, which seeks to ensure that local governments cooperate with federal immigration authorities.

The bill, presented by a committee member, emphasizes a protective measure against the establishment of sanctuary policies in North Dakota. The speaker noted that while no cities currently identify as sanctuary cities, the legislation aims to prevent any future declarations. Drawing on a directive from former President Trump, the bill asserts that states have the right to respond to what he termed an "invasion" of illegal immigrants at the southern border.

Central to the discussion was the bill's language, which outlines strict prohibitions against local entities adopting policies that would hinder communication with federal immigration officials. The proposed law would mandate that state agencies and political subdivisions must assist federal authorities in verifying the immigration status of individuals and transferring illegal immigrants to federal custody when necessary.

A significant aspect of the bill is the enforcement mechanism it introduces. If a complaint is filed against a political subdivision for failing to comply with the law, the Attorney General has the authority to investigate. Should a violation be confirmed, the Attorney General would issue an opinion detailing the findings. Political subdivisions would then have 30 days to either comply or appeal the decision in court.

The consequences for non-compliance are notable. If a political subdivision refuses to adhere to the Attorney General's findings, the state treasurer would be directed to withhold funding from that entity, effectively penalizing them for not following state law.

As the meeting progressed, lawmakers engaged in a thorough examination of the bill's provisions, weighing the balance between state rights and federal cooperation. The discussions underscored a broader national conversation about immigration policy and local governance, reflecting the complexities of addressing illegal immigration at both state and federal levels.

In conclusion, the proposed legislation represents a significant step in North Dakota's approach to immigration enforcement, aiming to eliminate sanctuary policies and ensure compliance with federal immigration laws. As the bill moves forward, its implications will likely resonate beyond state lines, contributing to the ongoing dialogue surrounding immigration in America.