South Dakota Legislature repeals teacher certification reimbursement programs in House Bill 1039
February 21, 2025 | House, Introduced, 2025 Bills, South Dakota Legislation Bills, South Dakota
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
House Bill 1039, introduced in the South Dakota Legislature on February 21, 2025, seeks to repeal existing programs that reimburse teachers and school counselors for obtaining national board certification. The bill, presented by the Chair of the Committee on Education at the request of the Department of Education, aims to eliminate financial support for educators pursuing this credential.
The primary provisions of House Bill 1039 include the repeal of Section 13-1-54, which currently allows for reimbursement of fees associated with the application and examination process for the National Certified School Counselor credential. Additionally, it removes the stipends of $2,000 per year for counselors who achieve this certification, which were partially funded by both the Department of Education and the employing school district.
The bill has sparked notable debate among lawmakers and education advocates. Proponents argue that the repeal could help redirect funds to other pressing educational needs, while opponents contend that it undermines efforts to enhance the quality of education by discouraging professional development among counselors and teachers. Critics fear that removing financial incentives may lead to a decline in the number of certified professionals in South Dakota's schools, potentially impacting student support services.
The implications of House Bill 1039 extend beyond immediate financial considerations. If passed, the bill could affect the recruitment and retention of qualified educators in the state, raising concerns about the overall quality of education. Experts suggest that investing in teacher certification programs is crucial for improving educational outcomes, and the repeal may hinder progress in this area.
As the legislative session continues, stakeholders are closely monitoring the bill's progress and its potential impact on South Dakota's educational landscape. The next steps will involve further discussions and possible amendments as lawmakers weigh the benefits and drawbacks of this significant legislative proposal.
The primary provisions of House Bill 1039 include the repeal of Section 13-1-54, which currently allows for reimbursement of fees associated with the application and examination process for the National Certified School Counselor credential. Additionally, it removes the stipends of $2,000 per year for counselors who achieve this certification, which were partially funded by both the Department of Education and the employing school district.
The bill has sparked notable debate among lawmakers and education advocates. Proponents argue that the repeal could help redirect funds to other pressing educational needs, while opponents contend that it undermines efforts to enhance the quality of education by discouraging professional development among counselors and teachers. Critics fear that removing financial incentives may lead to a decline in the number of certified professionals in South Dakota's schools, potentially impacting student support services.
The implications of House Bill 1039 extend beyond immediate financial considerations. If passed, the bill could affect the recruitment and retention of qualified educators in the state, raising concerns about the overall quality of education. Experts suggest that investing in teacher certification programs is crucial for improving educational outcomes, and the repeal may hinder progress in this area.
As the legislative session continues, stakeholders are closely monitoring the bill's progress and its potential impact on South Dakota's educational landscape. The next steps will involve further discussions and possible amendments as lawmakers weigh the benefits and drawbacks of this significant legislative proposal.
View Bill
This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution
View Bill