Minnesota proposes constitutional amendment to limit legislative and executive terms

Minnesota lawmakers are considering a significant constitutional amendment aimed at limiting the terms of office for state legislators and executive officers. Introduced on February 20, 2025, Senate Bill 1694 proposes changes to the Minnesota Constitution that would restrict state representatives to a maximum of 20 years in the legislature and prohibit governors and lieutenant governors from serving more than two consecutive terms.

The bill, authored by Senator Draheim, seeks to address concerns about political longevity and the potential for entrenched power within state government. If passed, the amendment would revise Article IV, Section 4, and Article V, Sections 2 and 4 of the Minnesota Constitution. Specifically, it would establish a two-year term for representatives and a four-year term for senators, with the stipulation that all senators would face re-election following legislative apportionment. Additionally, the amendment would prevent individuals from running for a third term as governor or lieutenant governor.

Supporters of the bill argue that term limits could foster fresh perspectives in government and enhance accountability among elected officials. They believe that limiting terms may encourage more citizens to engage in public service and reduce the influence of career politicians. However, the proposal has sparked debates among lawmakers and constituents, with some expressing concerns that term limits could lead to a loss of experienced leadership and institutional knowledge.

The economic and political implications of Senate Bill 1694 could be substantial. Advocates suggest that introducing new leaders could invigorate state policies and responsiveness to constituents' needs. Conversely, critics warn that frequent turnover might disrupt legislative continuity and hinder long-term planning.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, it will be crucial for lawmakers to weigh the potential benefits of increased political turnover against the risks of instability in governance. The outcome of this proposal could reshape Minnesota's political landscape, influencing how future leaders are elected and how effectively they can serve their constituents. The next steps will involve further discussions and potential amendments as the bill is reviewed by the State and Local Government Committee.