Minnesota to ban mercury in batteries starting January 2027

February 20, 2025 | Senate Bills, Introduced Bills, 2025 Bills, Minnesota Legislation Bills, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Minnesota to ban mercury in batteries starting January 2027
Minnesota lawmakers are taking a bold step towards environmental protection with the introduction of Senate Bill 1690, aimed at banning mercury in batteries. Introduced on February 20, 2025, the bill seeks to eliminate the sale and distribution of certain mercury-containing batteries in the state, marking a significant move in the fight against hazardous waste.

The bill specifically targets alkaline manganese batteries, nonrechargeable button cell batteries with mercury content exceeding 25 milligrams, and dry cell batteries featuring mercuric oxide electrodes. These provisions are designed to reduce the environmental and health risks associated with mercury exposure, which is known to have detrimental effects on both human health and ecosystems.

Notably, the bill includes compliance measures for manufacturers, allowing exemptions under specific conditions if no feasible alternatives are available. This aspect has sparked discussions among industry stakeholders, with some expressing concerns about the potential economic impact on battery manufacturers and the availability of compliant products.

The legislation is set to take effect on January 1, 2027, giving manufacturers time to adjust to the new regulations. As the bill progresses through the legislative process, experts anticipate heated debates surrounding its implications for both public health and the economy. Advocates for the bill argue that the long-term benefits of reducing mercury pollution far outweigh the short-term challenges for manufacturers.

As Minnesota moves forward with this initiative, the outcome of Senate Bill 1690 could set a precedent for other states considering similar environmental protections, highlighting the growing urgency to address toxic substances in consumer products. The bill's fate will be closely watched as it navigates the legislative landscape, with potential ripple effects on both state policy and public health initiatives.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI