Minnesota legislature mandates permit holders notify name or address changes

February 20, 2025 | Senate Bills, Introduced Bills, 2025 Bills, Minnesota Legislation Bills, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Minnesota legislature mandates permit holders notify name or address changes
A new legislative proposal, Senate Bill 1653, is making waves in Minnesota as it seeks to tighten regulations surrounding permit holders for carrying firearms. Introduced on February 20, 2025, the bill mandates that individuals with a permit to carry must notify the issuing sheriff within 30 days of any legal name change or permanent address change. Failure to comply could result in a petty misdemeanor, with fines capped at $25 for first-time offenders.

The bill, sponsored by Senators Limmer and Latz, aims to enhance public safety by ensuring that law enforcement has up-to-date information on permit holders. This move comes amid ongoing discussions about gun safety and accountability in the state. Proponents argue that accurate records are essential for effective policing and community safety, while critics express concerns about the potential for increased penalties and the implications for personal privacy.

In addition to the notification requirement, the bill outlines a process for obtaining a replacement permit card for those who have lost or destroyed their original. A $10 fee will be charged for the replacement, which must be requested through a standardized application.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, it has sparked debates about the balance between public safety and individual rights. Experts suggest that if passed, this legislation could set a precedent for similar measures in other states, potentially reshaping the landscape of gun ownership regulations nationwide.

With the bill currently referred to the Judiciary and Public Safety Committee, stakeholders are closely watching its trajectory. The outcome could have significant implications for both gun owners and law enforcement in Minnesota, as the state grapples with the complexities of firearm regulations in a changing social climate.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI