Minnesota bans lead sinkers and jigs to protect aquatic environments

February 20, 2025 | Senate Bills, Introduced Bills, 2025 Bills, Minnesota Legislation Bills, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Minnesota bans lead sinkers and jigs to protect aquatic environments
On February 20, 2025, the Minnesota State Legislature introduced Senate Bill 1595, a significant piece of legislation aimed at addressing environmental and public health concerns related to lead usage in fishing and shooting sports. The bill proposes a comprehensive ban on the sale and manufacture of lead sinkers and jigs that weigh one ounce or less or measure 2.5 inches or less, effectively prohibiting these items in Minnesota. This measure seeks to mitigate the harmful effects of lead on wildlife and ecosystems, as well as on human health, particularly among youth engaged in shooting sports.

Key provisions of the bill include the definition of "jig" and "sinker," clarifying that these terms refer specifically to weighted hooks and devices designed to sink fishing lines, respectively, while excluding other fishing-related items. Additionally, the bill mandates that the Minnesota State High School League adopt rules prohibiting the use of lead ammunition in all shooting sports events, promoting the transition to nontoxic alternatives.

The bill also outlines appropriations for fiscal year 2026, allocating funds for a nontoxic ammunition voucher program and an ammunition buy-back and exchange program. Furthermore, it provides resources for the Minnesota Department of Health to conduct diagnostic blood lead level tests for individuals under 18 who participate in shooting sports, aiming to monitor and address potential lead exposure among young athletes.

Debate surrounding Senate Bill 1595 has highlighted concerns from various stakeholders. Proponents argue that the legislation is crucial for protecting wildlife and public health, while opponents express worries about the economic impact on local fishing and hunting industries. The bill's implications extend beyond environmental protection, as it also raises questions about the accessibility of nontoxic alternatives for recreational activities.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, experts suggest that its passage could set a precedent for similar environmental initiatives in other states, potentially influencing national policies on lead usage in recreational activities. The outcome of Senate Bill 1595 will be closely monitored, as it reflects a growing trend towards sustainability and public health awareness in outdoor sports and recreation.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI