Minnesota bans lead ammunition in state parks and scientific areas

February 20, 2025 | Senate Bills, Introduced Bills, 2025 Bills, Minnesota Legislation Bills, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Minnesota bans lead ammunition in state parks and scientific areas
The Minnesota State Legislature has introduced Senate Bill 1595, aimed at phasing out lead ammunition and fishing tackle in favor of nontoxic alternatives. Introduced on February 20, 2025, the bill seeks to address environmental and health concerns associated with lead exposure, particularly in hunting and fishing activities.

Key provisions of the bill include a prohibition on the use and possession of lead ammunition in designated scientific and natural areas, peatlands, and state parks. The legislation mandates that, after a specified date, lead ammunition will be entirely banned for hunting across Minnesota. To support this transition, the bill requires the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to educate hunters about the toxic effects of lead and promote nontoxic alternatives as part of its recruitment and retention efforts.

The bill also outlines penalties for violations, with fines starting at $500 for first offenses and escalating to between $1,000 and $5,000 for subsequent violations. Additionally, it proposes a voucher program to provide hunters with nontoxic ammunition at little or no cost, contingent on available funding.

Debate surrounding Senate Bill 1595 has highlighted concerns from various stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill is essential for protecting wildlife and public health, while opponents express worries about the financial implications for hunters and the potential impact on hunting practices.

The economic implications of the bill could be significant, as it may affect the hunting industry and related businesses. However, supporters believe that promoting nontoxic alternatives could lead to new market opportunities and enhance conservation efforts.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its potential to reshape hunting regulations in Minnesota and its impact on environmental health will be closely monitored. The next steps will involve further discussions and possible amendments before a final vote is taken.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI