House Bill 1947, introduced in Washington on February 20, 2025, aims to bolster the safety and reliability of public water systems across the state. The bill sets stringent requirements for the establishment of new group A and group B public water systems, ensuring that they are either owned or operated by a satellite system management agency or meet specific financial and operational criteria.

At the heart of the legislation is a mandate that no new group A public water system can be approved unless it is managed by a satellite system management agency that complies with financial viability standards. If such an agency is unavailable, the new system must demonstrate sufficient management and financial resources to provide safe drinking water. This provision is designed to prevent the establishment of systems that could compromise water quality or reliability.

For group B public water systems, which serve fewer connections, similar restrictions apply. New systems must also be managed by a satellite agency if they meet certain criteria, such as requiring treatment to meet water quality standards or providing fire flow. Local health boards are empowered to impose even stricter requirements, reflecting a commitment to public health and safety.

The bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers and stakeholders, with some praising its proactive approach to water management while others express concerns about potential bureaucratic hurdles for new water systems. Critics argue that the stringent requirements could stifle the creation of new systems in underserved areas, potentially exacerbating existing water access issues.

Economically, the bill could lead to increased costs for new water systems, as compliance with the financial viability requirements may necessitate additional investments. However, proponents argue that the long-term benefits of ensuring safe drinking water far outweigh these initial costs.

As House Bill 1947 moves through the legislative process, its implications for public health, environmental safety, and local governance will continue to be closely monitored. The bill represents a significant step toward safeguarding Washington's water supply, but its ultimate impact will depend on how it is implemented and enforced.