[{"_1":2,"_112":-5,"_113":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6323209,"mediaKeyId","2342954-27cbc9ac7c79b10f571d3499b90d5238","parentId",2342954,"title","Senate approves bill restricting certain semiautomatic firearms and adding training and exemption rules","audioSeconds",4190,"startMs",4113000,"endMs",8303000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2342954-27cbc9ac7c79b10f571d3499b90d5238&start=4113&end=8303","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2342954-27cbc9ac7c79b10f571d3499b90d5238/thumbnail_4113000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6323209/Colorado/Senate-approves-bill-restricting-certain-semiautomatic-firearms-and-adding-training-and-exemption-rules","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6323209-dc482337c37c2dc2f6cf731a6f0588a7/orig.mp4?Expires=1771146256&Signature=ERjLcvWwnO8mw18yRcz9AK~T7dP7TadrptVxxIHp~jddcQmCSE~PTR6vCC37Doyl9Nj9KP8-j8ZSsVRC-ITCyLej~LFpAbU0L1GtmZlU9VS3o-iR-QqX7dhszAJkP~F4MzU-UfNc4FkjqggAjd3iC3BEmpd8gPhYHPnMqgEKCAtFr1w7ZLeB1rM2M7JhE3OQKxN2taFUHAJxpiI7gLu4tSG9Ca0OEf0raflqDoWKyq8TxSujmROgt72VA0NN8FoIbdbpQBx9XH6L8kNrZAL87BNIoUYmy2PvPCISCRYcmTYcsAAyFZf-kOMaM-E30s5G80pu8zmyMEtd~SDwxei-zg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Colorado Legislature","date","2025-02-18T00:00:00Z","article","Senate Bill 3, concerning prohibited activity involving specified semiautomatic firearms, passed the Colorado Senate on Feb. 18, 2025, by a roll-call vote of 19 ayes and 15 no, following lengthy floor debate and several amendments.

The bill, as described on the Senate floor, prohibits certain activity involving semiautomatic firearms and classifies devices that increase the rate of fire as dangerous weapons. Sponsors said the measure targets public-safety risks while exempting many commonly used hunting rifles; opponents said the bill would treat the constitutional right to keep and bear arms as a government-granted privilege rather than a right.

Sponsor remarks and technical amendments
Sponsor Senator Gonzales asked permission to offer a technical third-reading amendment (L042) to clarify language such as replacing some terminology and to correct drafting errors; the body granted permission and later adopted the amendment. Senator Gonzales urged colleagues to support the bill and pointed out that the bill's exemptions cover common hunting rifles to avoid unintentionally singling out hunting tools.

Opposition: rights, registry and veteran exemptions
Opponents framed the bill as an intrusion into Second Amendment protections. The floor record includes extended speeches contending that the bill would create training requirements, a form of registry, and a permissions regime that could be used to deny the exercise of a constitutional right. Several senators said the proposal requires citizens to take courses or register to exercise firearm ownership in ways that differ from traditional conceptions of the right to keep and bear arms.

Quotes and key positions
- \"If the second amendment were treated like a hunting license ... we would face arbitrary restrictions,\" the minority leader said during a floor speech opposing the bill, arguing the measure treats rights as privileges. (Transcript: extensive remarks opposing SB3.)
- Sponsor Senator Gonzales emphasized exemptions for hunting rifles and urged an aye vote, saying the bill had been shaped with hunting stakeholders in mind.

Vote and aftermath
- Motion: Adoption of committee and amendments and final passage on third reading.
- Vote: Senate Bill 3 passed on final passage with a tally of 19 ayes, 15 no, 0 absent, 0 excused, and 1 vacant; outcome: passed.
- After passage, two senators requested removal as cosponsors in the record (Senator Snyder and Senator Exum), as read on the floor.

Clarifying details discussed on the floor
- Sponsor and proponents said the bill exempts many common hunting rifles and included an amended list of specified models; floor debate noted this was intended to address hunting-community concerns.
- Opponents emphasized earlier amendments (offered in committee and on the floor) and argued that the bill's classification lists and annual updates could create inconsistent exemptions.

Why this matters
Senate Bill 3 drew sustained debate because it touches on constitutional rights, public-safety arguments, exemptions for hunters and veterans, and questions about whether and how the state should require training or registration for certain firearm purchases. The law will shape Colorado's regulatory approach to semiautomatic firearms and specifies which variants are prohibited or exempted—and how those lists are maintained.

Speakers quoted in this report are identified in the official Senate transcript.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Colorado Senate 2025 Legislative Day 042 Feb 18, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Senate Bill 3, a measure restricting certain semiautomatic firearms and creating exemptions and training requirements, passed the Colorado Senate on Feb. 18, 2025, by a roll-call vote of 19 ayes to 15 no.","taxTitle","2025 Legislature CO, Colorado","taxId",77676,"location","Colorado","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6323205,"Senate adopts bill setting standards for public school library policies and reconsideration requests",813,8429000,9242000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2342954-27cbc9ac7c79b10f571d3499b90d5238&start=8429&end=9242","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2342954-27cbc9ac7c79b10f571d3499b90d5238/thumbnail_8429000.jpg","/articles/6323205/Colorado/Senate-adopts-bill-setting-standards-for-public-school-library-policies-and-reconsideration-requests","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6323205-c6e27d4e627c143954180dcf891c6f15/orig.mp4?Expires=1771146256&Signature=U9GEXddULKnlIEdQltBGzQ41fXwMhbejJeVgrfCDHRInoY-BrEZK8z0rwFimgO~6yPc2dLbRop3Tvo1ToL3-rre7eZKavaCQ~MJBLJfjUZd55MOWTuzyuxNgZgHbE7FBqSJ2GKqhkrZWZQn71k1tfcypR2EChf7YvIUMQRLyQn97KBHRkwn63LrnFx-b6dwIxsX1beXLyrylsod3GuutsGgY7w6RQw9h8z03Fd2CirnHqzrT6nkwj8Bp2SAQJ-ObzXQZJTbN168vYgez6-3GrT9sHzn-s~RRBL7kp8c7O0T7A0ODT7rRydiV7IYWHZutbM1FiHYB~k2stDDus1x-pQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senate Bill 63, establishing standards for school library policies and a process for reconsideration of instructional and library materials, was adopted by the Colorado Senate on Feb. 18, 2025. The chamber adopted an amendment (L008) on the floor before approving the bill.

The bill requires public school districts to adopt and publish a policy for reconsideration requests for library and curricular materials; the floor record shows the bill limits who may file a formal request to parents of currently enrolled students and subjects requests and determinations to Colorado Open Records Act (CORA) review. The bill also includes a two-year limit on repeating requests for the same material and protections against retaliation for librarians following district policies.

Supporters and scope
Senator Cutter and co-prime sponsor Senator Michaelson Janae defended the bill as respecting local control while increasing transparency and protecting librarians. \"This bill protects the constitutional rights of students in Colorado,\" said Senator Cutter, and the sponsors said the bill was refined in committee to limit overly prescriptive mandates and to require standing for requesters.

Opponents and concerns
Senator Lundin spoke at length in opposition, arguing the bill is not ready for implementation and saying it would impose administrative costs on 178 school districts that could divert funds from classroom instruction and teacher pay. He said parents who are not yet enrolled in a district would not be able to initiate reconsideration and expressed concern about the statute's reliance on court and constitutional interpretations.

Clarifying details
- Standing: Reconsideration requests are limited to parents of enrolled students; outside parties are not given standing to file formal reconsideration requests under the bill as amended on the floor (sponsor/co-sponsor remarks).
- Records: Reconsideration materials and decisions are subject to CORA, making them part of the public record.
- Timing: A two-year bar prevents repeated formal reconsideration requests on the same material.

Formal action
- Motion: Adopt amendment L008 and pass Senate Bill 63 as amended.
- Adoption: The Senate adopted the amendment and passed SB63 on second reading and later on final action in the legislative sequence; the transcript records the floor adoption with the ayes having it (tally not specified on the floor record excerpt).

Why this matters
The bill updates and standardizes the process by which parents and school communities can request review of library materials and establishes protections for librarians and library policies. Opponents say the statutory changes impose administrative burdens that could reduce classroom resources.

Speakers quoted in this report are identified in the official Senate transcript.","Senate Bill 63, which sets standards for public school library policies and a district-level process for reconsideration requests, was adopted by the Colorado Senate on Feb. 18, 2025, after a committee and floor amendment.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6323200,"Votes at a glance: Colorado Senate Feb. 18, 2025 — consent calendar and other final actions",1311,8059000,9370000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2342954-27cbc9ac7c79b10f571d3499b90d5238&start=8059&end=9370","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2342954-27cbc9ac7c79b10f571d3499b90d5238/thumbnail_8059000.jpg","/articles/6323200/Colorado/Votes-at-a-glance-Colorado-Senate-Feb-18-2025-consent-calendar-and-other-final-actions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6323200-97423cde0aaf7ba595cabd551e4f72db/orig.mp4?Expires=1771146256&Signature=CRlXWmFjuNmaq~oAOZJzvmF3AU5V7Ui1QG09NjNTKpLBRc-w75iR2hpGmEOHeW6zqlfYeiG32CGQ09i0lMLlnmRlggfepCdWVaRWxYuyNxmarxwzpdpafT5P4fiqwaQmSLS1GQI1UD64GT3mL6wrM4MB3YwbgV9uVJ4bH~y6nt3IQiwVdLSGmUTErGIEMrbA62~WL2sFY083tXsP8BYf~AlulaB05GxExinsS200H3MJ028scpSOU1WTwKMhtjMd3l7gtQggXIQSuir~uzZbEemv4liXMDoXMchOcqyZrECuqOp35e6YJ05dSGaixzKpFYrtmUi5x4Ts-NCuUTECig__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Colorado Senate recorded multiple final actions on Feb. 18, 2025. Below are the principal bills that received final passage with their outcomes as read into the record on the floor. (Detailed coverage of lengthy debates appears in separate articles.)

- Senate Bill 42: Addressing Colorado's behavioral health crisis response
Senate description: Measures to address Colorado's behavioral health crisis response (sponsor list in consent calendar).
Outcome: Passed on third reading (consent calendar). Recorded vote on the floor: 31 ayes, 3 no, 0 absent, 0 excused, 1 vacant. (Senate Journal read on floor.)

- Senate Bill 28: PERA risk-reduction measures
Senate description: Requires the Public Employees' Retirement Association to implement certain risk-reduction measures.
Outcome: Passed on third reading (consent calendar). Recorded vote: 34 ayes, 0 no, 0 absent, 0 excused, 1 vacant.

- Senate Bill 36: Colorado State Patrol bond exemption
Senate description: Exemption to the requirement that members of Colorado State Patrol post a bond.
Outcome: Passed on third reading (consent calendar). Recorded vote: 34 ayes, 0 no, 0 absent, 0 excused, 1 vacant.

- Senate Bill 67: Changes to the prosecution fellowship program
Senate description: Changes to the prosecution fellowship program.
Outcome: Passed on third reading with a recorded vote of 34 ayes, 0 no, 0 absent, 0 excused, 1 vacant.

- House Bill 10 58 (as received by the Senate): Title not fully repeated on floor
Outcome: Passed by the Senate on third reading with a recorded vote of 23 ayes, 11 no, 0 absent, 0 excused, 1 vacant.

- Senate Bill 105: Supplemental appropriation to Department of Public Safety (concurrence with House amendments)
Action: The Senate concurred with House amendments to S.B.105 and repassed the bill as amended. Final repassage vote: 32 ayes, 2 no, 0 absent, 0 excused, 1 vacant.
Note: The floor record indicates the House added a footnote that the Joint Budget Committee will make legally binding provisions in a forthcoming JBC bill; senators described the footnote and a forthcoming JBC action as belts-and-suspenders.

- Appointments confirmed
The Senate confirmed several appointments from the consent calendar, including trustees to the Colorado School for the Deaf and Blind and a Transportation Commission appointment (tallies printed on the floor record; consent calendar confirmations recorded as adopted by voice vote and roll calls where noted).

What this roundup excludes
This summary excludes the two extensively debated bills — Senate Bill 5 (labor peace second-election repeal) and Senate Bill 3 (semiautomatic firearms regulation) — which are summarized in separate articles because they drew extended debate and detailed floor amendments and roll-call votes.

Provenance: floor minutes and roll-call reads from the Feb. 18, 2025 Senate session (consent calendar announcements, third-reading motions and roll-call tallies as read aloud by the clerk and majority leader).","A roundup of bills the Colorado Senate passed with brief descriptions and roll-call results as recorded on Feb. 18, 2025. Major debated bills are covered separately.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6323213,"Senate passes bill removing Colorado's second-election labor safeguard",2864,1121000,3985000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2342954-27cbc9ac7c79b10f571d3499b90d5238&start=1121&end=3985","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2342954-27cbc9ac7c79b10f571d3499b90d5238/thumbnail_1121000.jpg","/articles/6323213/Colorado/Senate-passes-bill-removing-Colorados-second-election-labor-safeguard","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6323213-2ef45cbab4b2cc2517c71286958dcb2a/orig.mp4?Expires=1771146256&Signature=jurDEeQeb9OfOWbJtqgpcbtpUXyp-9260YZHt~7y9I0tQm4IdlWvroNXuqcbvNG8UBARSX8k-KLQH23jdBmL5CWGcoUFMIWKxCX6wpVuiiLtixTazwt5lgE~Gf5lqUlLr9DBeWfrtv~JP9DlQcihEBpQeuF8v72JRRhLAxXN2C5c4fq-~d-2juMmdceB93WsNc4AfbHb6Qeh52wk-LMlVJBaY-WbvCWi2UaPHfjj2dbM6H0KvQ4W~z~C5Dr4TnnzGD9Gkvazw5ctLcW3wJE93YcQVkLVJFNcilJvY2f8qjG7Z~XYBMA21pkcapnA1-~EQ240kxzCjN6d39neuNHL-Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senate Bill 5, which removes Colorado's requirement for a second election before mandatory union dues can be imposed, passed the Colorado Senate on Feb. 18, 2025, by a roll-call vote of 22 ayes, 12 no, 0 absent, 0 excused and 1 vacant.

The measure repealS the state's second-election step in the Colorado Labor Peace Act, a procedure supporters and some lawmakers described as an historic obstacle that made it harder for workers to complete union organizing. \"Senate Bill 5 simply removes this second election,\" sponsor Senator Danielson said on the floor, arguing the second vote was unnecessary and functioned as a union-blocking mechanism.

Supporters: why they pushed the change
Supporters, including Senator Danielson, said the second election requirement was unique, outdated and often served as a de facto barrier to workers who had already expressed support for union representation in a federally supervised first election. \"This bill just removes that second election, which was put in place 81 years ago as a union-busting tactic,\" Danielson said, urging colleagues to approve the measure. Proponents said removing the second vote would let workers complete a single, federally supervised process and begin bargaining without further delay.

Opposition: concerns about compulsion and economic impact
Opponents delivered extended floor speeches warning that SB5 would allow a simple majority to impose dues or maintenance fees on an entire workforce. Minority party members and several Republicans said the change would reduce worker protections and could increase costs for employers. \"This bill does nothing more than put handcuffs on workers and businesses alike,\" Senator Frizzell said, arguing it would compel workers to fund representation they might oppose.

Several senators from rural and small-business districts said they had heard concerns from employers and employees in their communities. Senator Kirk Meyer noted the bill removes long-standing thresholds and questioned the timing, while Senator Catlin and others raised concerns about the potential effect on small restaurants and rural employers with few employees.

What the law changes and clarifying details
- Current process: Under the Colorado Labor Peace Act, after a federal election establishing union support, some workplaces have had to clear a second state-level vote with a 75% threshold before certain dues or agency fees apply.
- Effect of SB5: Eliminates the second, 75%-threshold election and relies on the initial federally supervised vote to begin certain collective-bargaining processes. (Clarified by Senator Danielson on the floor.)
- Sponsor's stated intent: Speed and completion of the organizing process for workers who already won a federal election.

Formal action
- Motion: Senator Danielson moved Senate Bill 5 on third reading and final passage.
- Vote: 22 ayes, 12 no, 0 absent, 0 excused, 1 vacant; outcome: passed.
- Named no votes recorded in the transcript where read aloud included: Senator Simpson, Senator Frizzell, Senator Catlin, Senator Kirk Meyer, Senator Carson, Senator Pelton R, and Senator Lisonbee. (Transcript shows the roll call names read aloud; the official roll contains 12 no votes.)

Why this matters
Lawmakers framed the vote as a choice about whether Colorado should maintain a unique, state-level hurdle in organizing or align the process with the federal election outcome. Supporters said the change advances worker access to collective bargaining; opponents warned it creates financial compulsion for nonmembers and risks economic harm for small employers.

What happens next
The bill was passed by the Senate on final reading and, per the legislative process, will proceed to the next steps required for enactment. The text and any implementing guidance will determine how the change is applied in specific sectors and workplaces.

Speakers quoted in this report are identified in the official Senate transcript.","The Colorado Senate passed Senate Bill 5 on Feb. 18, 2025, eliminating the state's 81-year-old second-election requirement under the Colorado Labor Peace Act. Supporters said the change removes a barrier for workers seeking union representation; opponents said it would erode worker choice and harm businesses.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Senate approves bill restricting certain semiautomatic firearms and adding training and exemption rules

Senate adopts bill setting standards for public school library policies and reconsideration requests

Votes at a glance: Colorado Senate Feb. 18, 2025 — consent calendar and other final actions

Senate passes bill removing Colorado's second-election labor safeguard