Oregon's Senate Bill 91 is set to reshape firefighting practices across the state by banning the sale, use, and disposal of firefighting foam containing harmful perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Introduced on February 19, 2025, the bill aims to address growing concerns over the environmental and health impacts of PFAS, which have been linked to serious health issues, including cancer and liver damage.
The legislation, which will take effect on January 1, 2026, prohibits not only the sale and use of PFAS firefighting foam but also its disposal at designated facilities and municipal waste systems. This comprehensive approach underscores the urgency of mitigating PFAS contamination, particularly in water sources.
The Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) is tasked with establishing a program for the safe collection and disposal of PFAS firefighting foam, ensuring that existing stocks are managed responsibly. This move has sparked discussions among environmental advocates and industry stakeholders, with proponents praising the bill as a necessary step toward public health and environmental safety. Critics, however, express concerns about the potential costs and logistical challenges for fire departments that rely on these foams for effective firefighting.
As Oregon joins a growing number of states taking action against PFAS, the implications of Senate Bill 91 extend beyond environmental policy. Experts suggest that this legislation could set a precedent for stricter regulations nationwide, influencing how other states approach the management of hazardous substances. The bill's passage could also ignite further debates on the balance between public safety and environmental stewardship, as communities grapple with the legacy of PFAS in firefighting practices.
With the bill now in the legislative process, all eyes will be on the EQC's implementation strategy and how it will affect firefighting operations statewide. As Oregon moves forward, the outcomes of this legislation could have lasting impacts on both public health and environmental policy in the years to come.