Connecticut's House Bill 6975 is set to spark crucial discussions around mental health care equity as it proposes a biennial study to assess payment parity between mental health services and general health care services under state insurance policies and the HUSKY Health program. Introduced on February 14, 2025, the bill aims to address longstanding disparities in reimbursement rates that have left mental health providers at a financial disadvantage compared to their medical counterparts.

The bill mandates the Commissioner of Health Strategy, in collaboration with the Insurance Commissioner and the Commissioner of Social Services, to investigate whether mental health providers receive equitable compensation for their services. This inquiry will focus on comparing payments across various insurance policies and the state’s HUSKY Health program, which serves low-income residents.

Supporters of the bill argue that ensuring payment parity is essential for improving access to mental health care, particularly as the state grapples with rising mental health issues exacerbated by the pandemic. Advocates believe that fair compensation will encourage more providers to offer mental health services, ultimately benefiting patients who often face barriers to care.

However, the bill is not without its critics. Some insurance industry representatives express concerns that mandated payment parity could lead to increased insurance premiums, potentially making health care less affordable for consumers. The debate is expected to intensify as stakeholders weigh the economic implications against the pressing need for mental health services.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, its outcomes could have significant implications for mental health care accessibility in Connecticut. If passed, the first report is due by January 1, 2026, setting the stage for ongoing evaluations of mental health service funding and its impact on public health. The discussions surrounding House Bill 6975 will likely shape the future landscape of mental health care in the state, making it a pivotal point of focus for lawmakers and advocates alike.