The Minnesota House Education Finance Committee meeting on February 18, 2025, highlighted critical concerns regarding the future of educational support professionals (ESPs) and paraeducators in the state. A key focus was the potential impact of proposed legislation, specifically HF6, which could significantly alter funding and support structures for these essential roles.

During the meeting, speakers emphasized the importance of maintaining financial reserves for community education programs, which have proven vital during unexpected events like the pandemic. They warned that allowing fund transfers could undermine the integrity of these programs, jeopardizing their long-term sustainability. The funds in question are generated through user fees, local levies, and state aid, and redirecting them could threaten the foundational principles of responsible fund management.

Theresa Greniger, a paraprofessional at King Elementary, voiced her concerns about the proposed changes in HF6, stating that they could drastically affect the support provided to students. She highlighted the struggles of paraeducators, who are among the lowest-paid staff in schools, and the critical role they play in fostering students' academic and social growth. Greniger noted that without unemployment benefits, many paraeducators would be unable to afford their positions, which could lead to increased turnover and negatively impact student support.

Katina Taylor, president of the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers' ESP chapter, echoed these sentiments, arguing that the proposed changes would strip away essential job protections and benefits for ESPs. She pointed out that while there have been some financial improvements due to increased state funding, many ESPs still face economic challenges, including low pay and rising insurance costs. Taylor urged committee members to reject HF6, emphasizing that the bill would roll back progress and make it harder for ESPs to sustain their livelihoods.

Kim Kaneokua, a paraeducator from the Fridley School District, stressed the necessity of paid training for paraeducators. She argued that adequate training is crucial for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of support staff, particularly for vulnerable students. Kaneokua called for more comprehensive training programs rather than making them optional, asserting that well-trained paraeducators are essential for student success.

The discussions at the meeting underscored the urgent need for legislative action to protect the rights and livelihoods of educational support professionals and paraeducators. As the committee considers the implications of HF6, the voices of those directly impacted by these decisions highlight the critical role they play in the educational landscape and the potential consequences of undermining their support systems.