Senate committee debates eminent domain authority for star bond projects

February 14, 2025 | Commerce, Standing, Senate, Committees, Legislative, Kansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate committee debates eminent domain authority for star bond projects
The Senate Committee on Commerce convened on February 14, 2025, to discuss several amendments related to the use of eminent domain in the establishment of star bond districts. The meeting began with procedural clarifications regarding a motion to divide the question on the amendments, which was approved by a voice vote.

The first amendment under consideration aimed to eliminate the authority for state and municipal governments to use eminent domain for the creation of star bond districts. Senator Tyson expressed support for the amendment but suggested that further clarification might be necessary, indicating that the current use of eminent domain is already limited. Senator Kim echoed this sentiment, raising concerns about how this amendment might restrict local governments' ability to make decisions regarding eminent domain for future projects.

Senator Deacon also contributed to the discussion, emphasizing the need for more information before proceeding, particularly since many members have star bond projects in their districts. He highlighted the importance of consulting with municipal governments to ensure that the amendment does not hinder local decision-making.

The Legislative Research Department provided context by referencing a 2014 memo that detailed past uses of eminent domain, including a notable case involving the construction of a racetrack in Wyandotte County. This case upheld the use of eminent domain for public purposes related to tax increment financing and star bonds.

As the discussion progressed, procedural issues arose regarding the lack of a formal motion before the committee. Senator Tyson pointed out that while a motion to divide had been made, there was no initial motion to divide. This led to a suggestion to withdraw the motion to divide and address the amendments one at a time.

The meeting concluded with a call for further discussion and clarity on the implications of the proposed amendments, particularly regarding their impact on local governance and ongoing star bond projects. The committee plans to revisit these issues in future sessions to ensure informed decision-making.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Kansas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI