In a recent meeting of the Senate Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection in Hawaii, lawmakers discussed two significant measures aimed at addressing consumer protection and public health concerns. The first measure, SB 985, seeks to establish a new law to combat gift card fraud, while the second, SB 1525, focuses on regulating electronic smoking devices and e-liquids.

The discussion around SB 985 highlighted the urgent need for protective measures against gift card scams, particularly affecting vulnerable populations such as seniors. Testimonies from individuals like Rosie Davis, a victim of gift card fraud, emphasized the emotional and financial toll these scams take on residents. Davis urged retailers to implement better packaging and display methods for gift cards to deter scammers, suggesting that such changes would not only protect consumers but also enhance the economic stability of local businesses.

However, the Retail Merchants of Hawaii expressed opposition to the bill, arguing that the proposed measures could impose significant costs on retailers without effectively deterring fraud. Tina Yamaki, representing the merchants, advocated for stricter penalties for fraud rather than additional packaging requirements, stating that the current laws do not adequately address the issue.

The committee also heard support for SB 985 from various organizations, including AARP, which echoed the need for stronger consumer protections in light of the staggering losses from gift card scams, estimated at over $100 million in 2024 alone.

Turning to SB 1525, the committee faced a more contentious debate regarding the regulation of electronic smoking devices. The measure would require manufacturers to submit annual certifications to the Department of Taxation, ensuring compliance with federal regulations. However, the Attorney General's office and the Department of Health voiced strong opposition, citing concerns that the bill could conflict with federal law and fail to effectively curb youth access to flavored tobacco products.

Critics of SB 1525 argued that the bill could inadvertently allow unauthorized products to remain on the market, undermining public health efforts to combat youth vaping. The Hawaii Public Health Institute also opposed the measure, calling it a waste of resources and emphasizing the need for more effective solutions to the youth vaping epidemic.

As the committee continues to deliberate these measures, the outcomes could significantly impact consumer protection and public health in Hawaii. The discussions reflect a broader commitment to safeguarding residents from fraud and ensuring the safety of tobacco products, but the path forward remains complex and contentious.