Malden City Council faces public resistance over courthouse and community building sales

The Malden City Council convened on February 11, 2025, to address several pressing issues, including public comments on proposed resolutions regarding the sale of key city properties. The meeting commenced with an acknowledgment of the Massachusetts, Pennacook, and Pawtucket peoples, emphasizing the city's commitment to recognizing indigenous histories and contributions.

The first item on the agenda was public comment, where Tina Lagarde, Executive Director of Urban Media Arts, voiced concerns regarding Resolution 80 20.25, which proposes the sale of the Malden District Courthouse and Oak Grove Community Building. Lagarde highlighted the urgent need for affordable housing but cautioned that selling these properties would significantly impact the community. She advocated for the courthouse to be transformed into a center for arts and culture, arguing that such a space would foster community engagement and artistic growth. Lagarde also pointed out potential legal challenges in repurposing the courthouse for housing, referencing existing restrictions on its use.

Following Lagarde's comments, several written submissions were read, expressing opposition to the sale of the Oak Grove Community Building. Jennifer R. Shelves, representing Mystic Valley Regional Charter School, noted that proposed zoning amendments would not affect their plans for Maplewood properties until 2032, while also raising concerns about the lack of compliance with planning board recommendations in the proposed amendments.

Carol Melly, from the Oak Grove Improvement Association, emphasized the historical significance of the Oak Grove Community Building, which has served as a vital gathering space for various community activities for nearly a century. She urged the council to reconsider the sale, highlighting ongoing efforts to secure grants for its renovation and reopening.

Additional comments from residents echoed these sentiments, stressing the importance of maintaining community spaces for engagement and connection. Concerns were raised about the transparency of the council's decision-making process, particularly regarding the lack of community input on the proposed sales.

The meeting concluded with a clear indication that the council would need to weigh the benefits of increasing affordable housing against the cultural and community value of the properties in question. The discussions underscored the need for a balanced approach that considers both housing needs and the preservation of community heritage. Further deliberations and potential follow-up actions are anticipated as the council continues to navigate these complex issues.