Resident David Smith demands refund for excessive fees on public records requests

During the Neosho County Regular Meeting on December 30, 2024, a significant portion of the discussion centered around concerns raised by a resident regarding the handling of public records requests and associated fees. The resident expressed frustration over perceived overcharges and delays in receiving requested documents, particularly a wage benefit study and various reports.

The resident detailed a series of grievances, starting with a $10 payment made in June for a wage benefit study that was not fully delivered. They highlighted that only part of the study was made public, and the delivery method was inconsistent with their request for email copies. This led to a broader discussion about the transparency and accessibility of public records, especially those that taxpayers have funded.

Further complaints included being charged $9.75 for a sick days payout report, which the resident argued should have only cost 50 cents. They also mentioned a $32.75 charge for budget submissions that they believed was excessive, particularly since similar information was readily available to commissioners without a research fee. The resident emphasized that they were the only core requester charged administrative research fees for documents that should have been easily accessible.

The resident's comments underscored a growing concern about the management of public records and the fees associated with obtaining them. They called for fair consideration in the processing of requests and questioned the rationale behind the fees, particularly the $28 per hour research fee, which they felt was unjustified given the salaries of those in the clerk's office.

In response to these grievances, the resident proposed a credit for future requests instead of a refund, indicating a willingness to work towards a resolution. They stressed the importance of the wage study being public information, as it relates to taxpayer interests and potential salary increases for county employees.

The meeting then transitioned to the consent agenda, which included accounts payable and payroll matters, indicating that while individual concerns were raised, the county's routine financial operations continued as planned. The discussions highlighted the ongoing need for clarity and fairness in the handling of public records, a topic that may require further attention from county officials moving forward.