On February 7, 2025, Maryland lawmakers introduced House Bill 1331, a legislative measure aimed at regulating the deployment of high-risk artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The bill seeks to address growing concerns over algorithmic discrimination and the management of personal data by requiring deployers of such systems to adhere to specific disclosure and risk management practices.
The primary provisions of House Bill 1331 mandate that deployers summarize their practices for managing known or foreseeable risks associated with algorithmic discrimination. Additionally, they must detail the nature, source, and extent of personal information collected or used in the deployment of these AI systems. Importantly, the bill stipulates that these disclosures must be updated periodically to ensure transparency.
A notable aspect of the bill is the provision allowing deployers to decline an opportunity for appeal if it is deemed contrary to the consumer's best interests, particularly in situations where delays could jeopardize consumer safety. This raises questions about the balance between consumer rights and safety, a point that has sparked debate among legislators and stakeholders.
House Bill 1331 also includes exemptions for smaller deployers, specifically those employing fewer than 50 full-time equivalent employees or those using AI systems trained on data not collected by them. This exemption aims to alleviate the regulatory burden on smaller entities while still promoting accountability among larger deployers.
The introduction of this bill comes amid increasing scrutiny of AI technologies and their potential impact on society. Experts have expressed that while the bill is a step towards accountability in AI deployment, its effectiveness will depend on rigorous enforcement and the willingness of deployers to comply with the new standards.
As discussions around House Bill 1331 continue, its implications for the tech industry and consumer protection are significant. If passed, the bill could set a precedent for how AI systems are regulated in Maryland and potentially influence similar legislative efforts in other states. The ongoing debates will likely focus on the balance between innovation and consumer rights, as well as the practicalities of implementing such regulations in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.