Wyoming House debates $5M grant for school resource officers amid safety concerns
February 07, 2025 | House of Representative, Committees, Legislative, Wyoming
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
A proposed amendment to establish a $5 million fund for competitive grants aimed at hiring school resource officers (SROs) was a focal point of discussion during the Wyoming Legislature's House Floor Session on February 7, 2025. The amendment, introduced in response to concerns over the safety of students following the elimination of gun-free zones, aimed to provide financial support for schools to address heightened fears among parents and educators.
The amendment's sponsor emphasized the urgency of the issue, stating, "Many of our school districts, teachers, and parents are very concerned... and truly fearful of how the elimination of the gun-free zones will affect the safety and security of students." The proposed funding would be administered by the state superintendent, allowing schools to apply for grants based on their specific needs.
However, the proposal faced significant pushback from several representatives. Critics argued that the one-time funding would only serve as a temporary solution to a much larger problem. Representative Smith contended that the focus should be on empowering teachers to carry firearms rather than relying on a single SRO, while others questioned whether law enforcement would be willing to take on the role of SROs in potentially dangerous environments.
Despite the concerns raised, supporters of the amendment maintained that it would provide a necessary stopgap for schools, particularly in rural areas where law enforcement presence is limited. Representative Davis noted that the funding could help districts develop long-term safety strategies while addressing immediate fears.
Ultimately, the amendment was put to a vote but failed to pass, with 21 votes in favor and 37 against. The discussion highlighted the ongoing debate in Wyoming regarding school safety, gun rights, and the best approaches to protect students in an evolving legislative landscape. As the session continues, lawmakers will need to navigate these complex issues while considering the safety and well-being of students across the state.
The amendment's sponsor emphasized the urgency of the issue, stating, "Many of our school districts, teachers, and parents are very concerned... and truly fearful of how the elimination of the gun-free zones will affect the safety and security of students." The proposed funding would be administered by the state superintendent, allowing schools to apply for grants based on their specific needs.
However, the proposal faced significant pushback from several representatives. Critics argued that the one-time funding would only serve as a temporary solution to a much larger problem. Representative Smith contended that the focus should be on empowering teachers to carry firearms rather than relying on a single SRO, while others questioned whether law enforcement would be willing to take on the role of SROs in potentially dangerous environments.
Despite the concerns raised, supporters of the amendment maintained that it would provide a necessary stopgap for schools, particularly in rural areas where law enforcement presence is limited. Representative Davis noted that the funding could help districts develop long-term safety strategies while addressing immediate fears.
Ultimately, the amendment was put to a vote but failed to pass, with 21 votes in favor and 37 against. The discussion highlighted the ongoing debate in Wyoming regarding school safety, gun rights, and the best approaches to protect students in an evolving legislative landscape. As the session continues, lawmakers will need to navigate these complex issues while considering the safety and well-being of students across the state.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting