Maryland lawmakers are taking significant steps to enhance consumer protections in the rapidly evolving landscape of mobile sports betting and fantasy sports. During a recent meeting of the W&M Committee on February 6, 2025, legislators discussed House Bill 465, which aims to address the rising concerns of problem gambling, particularly among young adults.

The bill proposes several key measures to safeguard players, including prohibiting the use of credit cards for mobile sports betting to prevent individuals from accruing debt due to gambling. Additionally, it mandates that mobile sports bettors set their own deposit limits, ensuring responsible play. The legislation also seeks to restrict marketing communications to players who have temporarily suspended their accounts, thereby reducing potential pressure to resume gambling.

One of the most pressing issues highlighted during the meeting was the alarming trend of problem gambling among young men aged 18 to 24. Studies indicate that this demographic is particularly vulnerable, with many engaging in sports betting despite legal age restrictions. The bill aims to raise the minimum age for participating in regulated fantasy competitions from 18 to 21, aligning it with existing age requirements for sports betting and casino gambling.

Moreover, the bill includes provisions to facilitate access to treatment for individuals who self-identify as having gambling problems. Those who apply for the voluntary exclusion program will be automatically referred for free counseling and support services, a recommendation supported by health officials and gambling experts.

The meeting also featured testimonies from various stakeholders, including representatives from the Maryland Center of Excellence on Problem Gambling, who emphasized the importance of these protections in light of increasing reports of harassment and mental health struggles among college athletes linked to gambling. The proposed legislation aims to codify existing protections against player-specific prop betting in college sports, which has been associated with rising instances of harassment.

In addition to House Bill 465, lawmakers discussed House Bill 484, which seeks to clarify the definition of fantasy sports and establish consumer protections for participants. This bill aims to distinguish fantasy competitions from traditional sports betting, ensuring that they are regulated appropriately while fostering innovation in the industry.

As Maryland continues to navigate the complexities of legalized gaming, these legislative efforts reflect a commitment to balancing the growth of the industry with the need for robust consumer protections. The committee's discussions signal a proactive approach to addressing the challenges posed by problem gambling, particularly among vulnerable populations.