[{"_1":2,"_122":-5,"_123":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,86,98,110],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},"mediaId",6356336,"mediaKeyId","2216674-aac8c79446a6674b1c0313b931c490d0","parentId",2216674,"title","Commission approves three Plano ISD preliminary replats for school sites, 5–0","audioSeconds",275,"startMs",311000,"endMs",586000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2216674-aac8c79446a6674b1c0313b931c490d0&start=311&end=586","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2216674-aac8c79446a6674b1c0313b931c490d0/thumbnail_311000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6356336/Plano/Collin-County/Texas/Commission-approves-three-Plano-ISD-preliminary-replats-for-school-sites-50","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6356336-76df1ba8871de60fadeb9f4adb05911e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770664973&Signature=NAWGHOladSfimIilN4vV2RRAnuUUz7bNmJwe5HKbST-AKjRnkHylQ36bLeRvSozq~akennV2X4Zx2WRlLqGn-uVYkwxIG74d23ZgztcCryFHPcG22HDTwkBO5adwLThW75qd2YeW0tbuHDU3b5cB-VIrjKctz3KqTCeBQkzYBp41jKSTZYDzLEp7QnF5DRcW79~3fg11FQxx3gAKGPX9N~JNicvfnUfQyC-n8CgAX4Zn0xN4w7zS4ZFfqabY~P75lSHbBvWWIRosElfyeaZSW5y~zeqNGNRvzs9Lkx1VBb2AuXGSJORkjqm3dzPLj95u3SE1QaOBJSUoovDWkVdM6w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-02-04T02:08:27Z","article","Plano Planning and Zoning Commissioners on Feb. 3 unanimously approved three preliminary replats submitted by Plano Independent School District for new school sites within the Park Boulevard Estates West area.

Staff planner John Kim said each item had been previously tabled on Jan. 21 and was recommended for approval subject to engineering plan additions or alterations required by the engineering department. The three items cover: (1) a public school on 64.7 acres at the northeast corner of Independence Parkway and Park Boulevard (Block A, Lot 1R); (2) a public school on 11.9 acres at the southeast corner of Independence Parkway and Park Haven Drive (Block A, Lot 2R); and (3) a site at the corner of Park Haven Drive and Wildcat Way (details as presented).

Public comment: staff said there were no registered speakers on any of the three items, and the commission closed each public hearing before taking the votes.

Votes and motions: Commissioner Lingenfelter moved approval of item 1 as recommended by staff; Commissioner Bender seconded and the motion passed 5–0. Commissioner Lolli moved approval of item 2 as recommended by staff; Commissioner Bender seconded; motion passed 5–0. For item 3, Commissioner Lingenfelter moved approval as recommended by staff; Commissioner Bender seconded and the vote passed 5–0.

Clarifying details: Staff noted approvals were subject to required engineering revisions and, for one item, approval of a revised site plan and a revised landscape plan (RSP2024‑063, RLP2024‑045 referenced elsewhere on the agenda). No registered public opposition was recorded during the commission hearing.

Speakers:
- John Kim, planner, City of Plano Planning Department (government, planning staff).
- Commissioner Lingenfelter (mover), Commissioner Bender (second), Commissioner Lolli (mover for item 2).

Provenance:
- topicintro: block_311.93 (introduction of item 1 public hearing)
- topicfinish: block_586.47 (motion passes 5 to 0 for item 3)

Outcome: All three preliminary replats approved 5–0 subject to engineering plan revisions and other standard conditions required by staff.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Planning & Zoning Commission Open Meeting - 02-03-2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Plano Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously approved three preliminary replats requested by Plano Independent School District for school sites in the Park Boulevard Estates West area on Feb. 3.","taxTitle","Plano, Collin County, Texas","taxId",2776,"location","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6356341,"Commission denies request to rezone Dallas North Tollway corner for single‑family homes, 5–0",490,3822000,4312000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2216674-aac8c79446a6674b1c0313b931c490d0&start=3822&end=4312","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2216674-aac8c79446a6674b1c0313b931c490d0/thumbnail_3822000.jpg","/articles/6356341/Plano/Collin-County/Texas/Commission-denies-request-to-rezone-Dallas-North-Tollway-corner-for-singlefamily-homes-50","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6356341-a0405d89ae407ff0ce701944144055f7/orig.mp4?Expires=1770664973&Signature=aZxvmiysW4dS~16787r6tonEiA76rtZq6gRSvrwWe89KvPKsilU2n~IQh1QdnxFOcLWRpOkfNDP~AHb0gdU1hy4HP6BI3UCmQ8mrc-69F-C1Lc4sWoR4obuMs7mzVm0~s4xPfe1azjfnjRNCWxh2sfg7sRXSTLN8raSRN2iftU-cIbR7YxmzcRuMUPk85Xag4O21~CiG7foxsX4XQsHLqmxm~8u6xWTN2PvQYlQaB4nu3mh4I9YGSvv8MSGieOWSmQ~iab3zRPj070RbTG45bMHZxdu7rgW2GsPtSrwGQ0yhikas0OlEVNL-wgIir53tsFde1SByXuFsAMY1q8ytrw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Plano Planning and Zoning Commission on Feb. 3 voted 5–0 to deny a request to rezone an undeveloped 8.6‑acre site at the northeast corner of Spring Creek Parkway and Communications Parkway to allow a 33‑lot single‑family subdivision (a legislative Zoning Case and associated concept plan). Staff had recommended denial, citing conflict with the future‑land‑use designation of Employment Center and the city’s undeveloped‑land policy that prioritizes employment‑generating uses for the Legacy business area.

Staff presentation: Planning staff said the subject property is currently zoned Commercial Employment (CE) and sits inside the Legacy business area and the Dallas North Tollway corridor. Staff told commissioners the Employment Center future‑land‑use category favors corporate offices, medical and research uses and that residential uses are “not appropriate” there because the city intends to reserve such land for employment‑generating development. Staff also raised access and setback issues: they said CE‑zoned towers proposed on adjacent parcels would typically be required to meet substantial setbacks from residential districts and that the applicant’s PD language would exempt the site from being treated as a residential district, thereby removing some of those protections.

Applicant presentation: Jerry Silo, representing the applicant, and Brian Robertson, the proposed purchaser/developer, argued the site is constrained by adjacent development patterns that, they said, make traditional commercial employment projects difficult to deliver. The applicant proposed building 33 luxury single‑family detached homes (SF‑6 standards) with builder commitments and said the proposed product would generate greater assessed value than an office park or small office condominiums. The applicant also sought waivers to subdivision design standards (street width, driveway spacing and other site‑specific items) citing site geometry and nearby development forms.

Commission discussion: Commissioners repeatedly cited the comprehensive plan and the city’s findings policy. Commissioner Brunoff said the proposal represented “beautiful homes in the wrong place,” noting the Employment Center designation and arguing the city must preserve land for higher‑intensity employment uses. Other commissioners echoed that view, saying the proposal did not meet the findings required to recommend rezoning from CE to a residential‑oriented plan development.

Outcome: Commissioner Bernoff moved to deny Zoning Case 2024‑027; Commissioner Bender seconded. The commission voted 5–0 to deny both the rezoning request and the associated concept plan. Staff record: the denial was based on inconsistency with the comprehensive plan’s guiding principles, the legacy business area land‑use pattern, and concerns about connectivity and long‑term protection for future adjacent uses.

Speakers:
- Jerry Silo, JBI Partners, applicant representative (business).
- Brian Robertson, developer/purchaser, Robertson Companies (business).
- Mark Hesse, attorney for applicant and nearby resident (business/citizen).
- Commissioner Brunoff, Commissioner Bernoff (mover), Commissioner Bender (second), other commissioners.

Authorities cited by staff: City comprehensive plan future‑land‑use designation (Employment Center); undeveloped‑land policy; Commercial Employment (CE) district standards and relevant setback formulas in the city zoning ordinance (Article 13). Staff referenced Zoning Case 2024‑027 in its recommendation.

Clarifying details: the applicant proposes 33 SF‑6 lots (minimum 6,000 sq. ft. lot size, 55‑ft width), front‑entry houses with two‑car garages and driveways; applicant estimated sale prices in the $2.5–$2.8 million range. Staff noted the property is adjacent to approved or proposed multi‑story independent‑living towers and a 4‑story independent‑living facility under construction to the north; staff said typical CE‑to‑residential adjacency protections would not apply under the applicant’s PD stipulation that would exempt the parcel from being treated as a residential district.

Provenance:
- topicintro: block_3822.255 (presentation of item 5A/5B description and staff analysis)
- topicfinish: block_7092.115 (motion passes 5 to 0 denying the items)

Votes at a glance:
- Zoning Case 2024‑027 (rezone CE to PD allowing SF‑6): motion to deny by Commissioner Bernoff; seconded by Commissioner Bender; vote 5–0; outcome: denied.
- Concept plan for 33‑lot subdivision: motion to deny by Commissioner Bernoff; seconded by Commissioner Bender; vote 5–0; outcome: denied.","Plano commissioners unanimously voted to deny a planned‑development rezoning request that would have allowed 33 single‑family lots at Spring Creek Parkway and Communications Parkway, citing inconsistency with the city’s employment‑center future‑land‑use designation and protections for adjacent commercial uses.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6356346,"Commission approves Willow Bend planned‑development amendment and revised concept plan, 4–1",3198,595000,3793000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2216674-aac8c79446a6674b1c0313b931c490d0&start=595&end=3793","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2216674-aac8c79446a6674b1c0313b931c490d0/thumbnail_595000.jpg","/articles/6356346/Plano/Collin-County/Texas/Commission-approves-Willow-Bend-planneddevelopment-amendment-and-revised-concept-plan-41","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6356346-8086b45d09f8876aac5109ff3019344d/orig.mp4?Expires=1770664973&Signature=TOfNL8xjThFzc8tvbvqjJXS5O3jNtqZ0vFF1xDME0veUGue-1aouDK-PLTx13uwGHBquN-0zSEPli53fn5FSQjuFkoOOQOwhIj6BuvBaoHX2xRXbN7CW7OjlFFdOo4p6zWJ1DeWKKWnk-a73JCO5JCALkRn0GOnv8cskMHRqDW8f7ngGjT6i9AJN5pVUOzlA8bHdTYtDol2k3PY1Lxb6k9lojynbUe68s9KROkjafn58kMY48kDTNHQuaYP1vAsz4uOJEMbCX2sP0vS8DTLDKqvkyF7P-5Jv91Q0fZqNaFltLAj-BoIK4iB57~6arkIQQOCwCHDMAxChqrJc-gI2mw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Plano Planning and Zoning Commissioners voted 4–1 on Feb. 3 to recommend approval of Zoning Case 2024‑020, an amendment to Planned Development (PD) 71, and a related revised concept plan for The Shops at Willow Bend, a mixed‑use redevelopment of the Willow Bend Mall property.

The amendment allows single‑family attached and detached units as part of the overall 965‑unit cap, reconfigures the open‑space plan, reduces the largest contiguous open space from about 2 acres to 1.5 acres, and adjusts phasing and development standards for the 89.1‑acre site along the Dallas North Tollway. Staff and the applicant said the total required open space will remain at 10 acres and the maximum unit count will not increase.

Why it matters: Centennial, the applicant and owner of several parcels at Willow Bend, is repositioning the aging mall into a mixed‑use center that retains some existing retail anchors while adding residential, hotel and public spaces. The commission’s action moves the plan to City Council review; several commissioners said revisions improved the project but raised parking and design concerns.

Molly Coriel, senior planner with the city’s planning department, told commissioners the revised concept preserves the northern portion of the mall, would demolish the southern portion that includes Macy’s, keeps the hotel along the tollway, and adopts a new open‑space and phasing plan as part of PD 71. Coriel said the plan would allow single‑family attached units to follow urban mixed‑use standards with a modification to allow all units to have frontage on mews streets and that the proposed single‑family uses are “modeled after PD 65 (Villas at Legacy West).”

The applicant presented renderings and market rationale. Bill Dahlstrom, applicant representative, said the team had shifted its approach after learning Macy’s would close and that they were asking to replace a planned mid‑rise building of about 300 units with 50 single‑family attached units in one phase. Michael Platt, an applicant representative, said the team is “very, very excited” about the property and described a vision of high‑street retail, residential phases and a new central green. Steve Levin, identified in the record as Centennial’s CEO, appeared with the applicant team and spoke to leasing and placemaking plans.

Commissioners asked about parking, visitor parking distances and emergency access. Coriel said the PD includes 208 on‑street parking spaces on the quasi‑public street network designated solely for single‑family uses; visitor parking must be within 600 feet of a unit and the single‑family parking ratio is 2.25 spaces per unit (two garage spaces plus one visitor space per four units).

Several commissioners praised the revised design and the applicant’s outreach but expressed reservations about parking and the look of the single‑family attached product. Commissioner Brunoff said he wanted the developer to prioritize attractive design for attached units; Commissioner Bender and others urged enforcement of parking and emergency‑access measures. The applicant said a 1,000‑space parking garage adjacent to the site will remain available under a reciprocal easement agreement covering the property.

Action and next steps: Commissioner Lingenfelter moved approval of the zoning amendment; Commissioner Bender seconded. The commission voted 4–1 in favor of 4A (the zoning amendment). For the revised concept plan (item 4B), the commission approved the plan 4–1, with the staff recommendation that City Council approve Zoning Case 2024‑020 before the city adopts the revised concept plan. Both approvals move to City Council for final action.

Votes at a glance:
- Zoning Case 2024‑020 (PD 71 amendment): motion to approve by Commissioner Lingenfelter; seconded by Commissioner Bender; vote 4–1; outcome: recommend approval to City Council.
- Revised concept plan for The Shops at Willow Bend (RCP/plan): motion by Commissioner ? (record shows motion to approve as recommended by staff); seconded; vote 4–1; outcome: recommend approval to City Council, contingent on Council approving 4A.

Speakers:
- Molly Coriel, senior planner, City of Plano Planning Department (government, planning staff).
- Bill Dahlstrom, applicant representative (business, applicant team).
- Michael Platt, applicant representative (business, applicant team).
- Steve Levin, CEO, Centennial (business, applicant/developer).
- Commissioner Lingenfelter (government, Planning & Zoning Commission).
- Commissioner Bender (government, Planning & Zoning Commission).
- Commissioner Brunoff (government, Planning & Zoning Commission).

Authorities cited in the hearing: zoning case 2024‑020 (PD 71 amendment); PD 65 (Villas at Legacy West) as design model; specific use permit No. 570 (automobile leasing/renting) and references to the Dallas North Tollway Overlay District and the city’s zoning ordinance provisions for open space and parking. City staff noted required revisions to engineering and to site and landscape plans (RSP2024‑063, RLP2024‑045) as part of approvals.

Clarifying details: the PD keeps the previously approved maximum of 965 residential units; the largest contiguous open space is reduced to 1.5 acres while total open space remains 10 acres; the single‑family required parking ratio is 2.25 spaces per unit; 208 on‑street spaces are reserved for single‑family uses and visitor parking must be within 600 feet of a unit. The applicant reported acquiring the Macy’s parcel and intends to fold it into the redevelopment.

Proper names: The Shops at Willow Bend; Willow Bend Mall; Neiman Marcus; Macy’s; Crate and Barrel; Dillard’s; Equinox; Centennial; The Bend (project brand); Dallas North Tollway; Plano Parkway.

Provenance evidence:
- topicintro: block_595.325 (\"Agenda item number 4 a. Is a zoning case 2024 dash020 ... This item was tabled on November 4, 2024, December 6, 2024, and January 6, 2025.\")
- topicfinish: block_3793.69 (\"Please vote. Motion passes 4 to 1. Thank you, gentlemen. We appreciate all your work on this. We're looking forward to the grand opening.\")","The Plano Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4–1 on Feb. 3 to amend Planned Development 71 and approve a revised concept plan for The Shops at Willow Bend, preserving part of the mall while adding single‑family uses and modifying open‑space and phasing standards; final zoning approval goes to City Council.",{"_33":99,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":100,"_41":101,"_43":102,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6356326,"Commission calls public hearing to consider UMU‑1 Heritage Creekside district amendment",48,4304000,4352000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2216674-aac8c79446a6674b1c0313b931c490d0&start=4304&end=4352","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2216674-aac8c79446a6674b1c0313b931c490d0/thumbnail_4304000.jpg","/articles/6356326/Plano/Collin-County/Texas/Commission-calls-public-hearing-to-consider-UMU1-Heritage-Creekside-district-amendment","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6356326-80b018aa26bdbe41b97fdf5a2630081e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770664973&Signature=HsLyMnxqntri6NzqV-EKR1gCMHvfe1GLhcXuvc4SiM6MVlWXqIssHmngdmKvwR~d5WVH2hNyxr3uXBRq~XE24rur-AhHBZ7agXzaEC0Nl182K0ZqtRvR66gVmZ7eOf5G3urVrJG5yyzwNuPwVHW-tYFEBZVGP1vmZnQZdSVuWP-nyZFX1bbI8GpNOtpI9~FQ62r8XpkYhmGuZt3os6AtiGxZErtDgTNZIxwv6fU8JV~Gl1w-L8lJMX8np3C-678Q2XibKrpuS6Vao8cwreDHe91wo29Hg-Isf31r54XqROa99-BNBhH4MRLae9vTiby-aXpRCSmFfSdfBKxiE-7cGw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Plano’s Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5–0 on Feb. 3 to call a public hearing on a proposed amendment to the Urban Mixed Use 1 (UMU‑1) Heritage Creekside district. Staff said the notice is required because the UMU‑1 district contains multiple property owners, although the applicant’s letter states the amendment would affect only the parcels owned by RPC.

Staff presented the request as a legislative call for public hearing; staff recommended the commission call the hearing so the public and other owners could be notified. Commissioner Lingenfelter moved to call the public hearing as recommended by staff; Commissioner Brunoff seconded and the commission voted 5–0 to schedule the hearing.

Speakers:
- Staff member (unnamed planner) who presented the call for hearing (government).
- Bill Dahlstrom and Kay Adkin were registered as applicant speakers and present but made no extended presentation; commissioners asked no substantive questions beyond clarification about owner consent thresholds. Staff noted that an amendment to a district with multiple owners requires owner consent or a public‑hearing process.

Clarifying details: staff said that without unanimous owner consent an amendment to a multi‑owner district must proceed through a public‑hearing process; the commission set a hearing date to allow notice and formal review.

Provenance:
- topicintro: block_7103.64 (introduction of non‑public hearing items and item 6 description)
- topicfinish: block_7252.59 (motion passes 5 to 0 calling the public hearing)

Next steps: staff will calendar the public hearing and notify property owners in the UMU‑1 district.","The commission voted 5–0 to call a public hearing on an applicant request to amend the Urban Mixed Use 1 (UMU‑1) Heritage Creekside district; staff said the proposed amendment would affect only parcels owned by a single applicant even though UMU‑1 has multiple property owners.",{"_33":111,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":112,"_41":113,"_43":114,"_45":115,"_47":116,"_49":117,"_51":118,"_53":119,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":120,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":121,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6356331,"Commission tables Haggard Farm Almanac preliminary site plan indefinitely at applicant request",78,165000,243000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2216674-aac8c79446a6674b1c0313b931c490d0&start=165&end=243","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2216674-aac8c79446a6674b1c0313b931c490d0/thumbnail_165000.jpg","/articles/6356331/Plano/Collin-County/Texas/Commission-tables-Haggard-Farm-Almanac-preliminary-site-plan-indefinitely-at-applicant-request","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6356331-335beeed84e71333eb812f3712f3237b/orig.mp4?Expires=1770664973&Signature=nAvaz7i1SfdAG2jWxSXDIeuxTRZSYUmu4a-G7UfA6cL~LSH0wRfbOIneMJopaxGvEIRVPMZfrXNpNk1joxJ3Fthj3gdfZ2c7gBP2NdbIaJwl8yvubc-g2NfmgRbP6RWdaJnZNxBNh7b4PLQLHZ-N3tvdq4bLXh8oPmUZuVokPTgz4a~xRTRXByl0~KPBrow1ZbMcrrZlEnQhtQnPHypxXuQDLXR7c59Wmae4WNtttWdEbY7kchwofqmPrKB11ACL0yP1A5JwJs2uIhphp1Ieneq-oqoq7EczT3OP1OmzORkEeJ~LR~8~nnQGs0So3UVdtVSzGy4dONjCPPn-ZqSWww__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The commission voted 5–0 on Feb. 3 to table indefinitely a preliminary site plan application for the Haggard Farm Almanac Edition (Block A Lots 24; 19.8 acres north of Pine Haven Drive). Donna Sepulvedo, lead planner with the Planning Department, said the applicant requested the tabling because of financing issues. The applicant was participating by Zoom (Maddie Pritchard, listed in the record), and no public speakers registered.

Commissioner Brunoff moved to table the item indefinitely; the motion was seconded by Commissioner Lingenfelter and passed 5–0. Staff noted the item was for administrative consideration and will return to the agenda if the applicant reactivates the application.

Speakers:
- Donna Sepulvedo, lead planner, City of Plano Planning Department (government).
- Maddie Pritchard, applicant (remote) (business).
- Commissioner Brunoff (mover); Commissioner Lingenfelter (second).

Clarifying detail: staff said the applicant cited financing issues; no further details were provided at the hearing.","The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5–0 to table indefinitely a preliminary site plan for the Haggard Farm Almanac Edition project after the applicant reported financing issues and asked to postpone consideration.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission approves three Plano ISD preliminary replats for school sites, 5–0

Commission denies request to rezone Dallas North Tollway corner for single‑family homes, 5–0

Commission approves Willow Bend planned‑development amendment and revised concept plan, 4–1

Commission calls public hearing to consider UMU‑1 Heritage Creekside district amendment

Commission tables Haggard Farm Almanac preliminary site plan indefinitely at applicant request