On January 20, 2025, Mississippi lawmakers introduced Senate Bill 2174, a legislative proposal aimed at reforming the requirements for obtaining a High School Equivalency Diploma in the state. This bill seeks to enhance the educational standards by incorporating a civics test, mirroring the Naturalization Test used by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.

The primary provision of Senate Bill 2174 mandates that, starting January 1, 2025, individuals must correctly answer at least 60 out of 100 questions from the civics portion of the Naturalization Test to qualify for a High School Equivalency Diploma. This requirement is intended to ensure that graduates possess a foundational understanding of U.S. civics, which proponents argue is essential for informed citizenship.

In addition to the civics testing requirement, the bill also grants the Mississippi Community College Board the authority to establish rules and regulations for administering the High School Equivalency Diploma Testing Program. This includes the ability to charge a fee of up to $5 for issuing additional copies of diploma transcripts, which could streamline administrative processes and provide a modest revenue source for the board.

The introduction of this bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers and educational advocates. Supporters argue that the civics requirement will better prepare graduates for active participation in democracy and civic life. Critics, however, express concerns about the potential barriers this may create for individuals seeking to obtain their diplomas, particularly those who may struggle with standardized testing.

The implications of Senate Bill 2174 extend beyond educational standards; they touch on broader social and political themes. By emphasizing civics education, the bill aims to foster a more informed electorate, which could have long-term effects on civic engagement and participation in the democratic process. However, the requirement may also disproportionately affect marginalized groups, raising questions about equity in educational access.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, it will likely face further scrutiny and debate. Stakeholders will be watching closely to see how lawmakers address concerns about accessibility while balancing the goal of enhancing civic knowledge among graduates. The outcome of this bill could set a precedent for similar educational reforms in other states, making it a significant point of discussion in the ongoing conversation about education and citizenship in America.