vetoed bill or item shall be by roll call, and the results shall be entered in the journal of the legislature.

Senate Joint Resolution 2 (SJR 2), introduced by Senator Claman on January 10, 2025, proposes a significant amendment to the Alaska State Constitution regarding legislative actions following a gubernatorial veto. The resolution aims to streamline the process by which the legislature can override vetoes, particularly focusing on the voting thresholds and timelines for reconsideration.

The key provision of SJR 2 modifies Article II, Section 16 of the Alaska Constitution. It lowers the threshold for overriding vetoes from a three-fourths majority to a two-thirds majority of the legislature's membership. This change applies to all vetoed bills, not just those related to revenue and appropriations, thereby broadening the scope of legislation that can be enacted despite a governor's veto.

The resolution also stipulates that if a bill is vetoed after the first regular session, the legislature must reconvene within five days of the next regular or special session to reconsider the veto. This requirement aims to ensure timely legislative action and responsiveness to the governor's vetoes.

Debate surrounding SJR 2 has highlighted concerns about the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches. Proponents argue that the amendment will enhance legislative authority and accountability, allowing elected representatives to have a greater say in the laws governing the state. Critics, however, warn that reducing the threshold could lead to more contentious legislative sessions and undermine the governor's ability to exercise veto power effectively.

The implications of SJR 2 could be significant, potentially altering the dynamics of Alaska's legislative process. If passed, it may encourage more robust legislative action and could lead to an increase in the number of bills becoming law despite gubernatorial opposition. The resolution is currently under review, with discussions expected to continue in the coming weeks as lawmakers assess its potential impact on governance in Alaska.