On January 14, 2025, the Utah Senate introduced S.B. 117, the Uniform Family Law Arbitration Act, spearheaded by Chief Sponsor Michael K. McKell. This legislative proposal aims to establish a comprehensive framework for arbitration in family law disputes, addressing a growing need for alternative dispute resolution methods in sensitive family matters.

The bill outlines several key provisions, including the definition of terms relevant to family law arbitration, the scope of the act, and the applicable laws governing arbitration in such disputes. It sets forth requirements for arbitration agreements, allowing parties to initiate arbitration through proper notice. Additionally, the act details the qualifications and selection process for arbitrators, mandates disclosures from involved parties and attorneys, and outlines the disqualification criteria for arbitrators.

Notably, S.B. 117 empowers courts and arbitrators to issue temporary orders during arbitration proceedings and addresses the handling of protection orders. It also stipulates the responsibilities of arbitrators, including the recording of hearings and the issuance of awards, while providing mechanisms for the confirmation, correction, or vacation of these awards by the court.

The introduction of this bill has sparked discussions regarding its implications for family law practices in Utah. Proponents argue that the act will streamline the arbitration process, reduce court congestion, and provide a more private and less adversarial means of resolving family disputes. However, concerns have been raised about the potential for unequal power dynamics in arbitration settings, particularly in cases involving domestic violence or child custody.

As the legislative session progresses, stakeholders from various sectors, including legal experts and family advocacy groups, are expected to weigh in on the bill. The outcome of S.B. 117 could significantly influence how family law disputes are resolved in Utah, potentially setting a precedent for other states considering similar legislation. The bill's future will depend on ongoing debates and any amendments that may arise as it moves through the legislative process.