The January 29, 2025, meeting of the Maryland General Assembly's Judiciary Proceedings Committee focused on Senate Bill 356, which seeks to repeal an outdated law regarding the criminalization of HIV transmission. The bill aims to remove a section of the Maryland Health General Code that specifically targets individuals with HIV, a statute enacted during the AIDS epidemic in 1989.

The primary discussion centered on the implications of repealing this law. Proponents argued that the current statute is antiquated and disproportionately affects marginalized communities, particularly Black and LGBTQ+ individuals. They emphasized that modern medical advancements have transformed HIV from a fatal disease into a manageable chronic condition. The bill's supporters, including community advocates and legal representatives, asserted that repealing the law would not only align with current public health policies but also facilitate a more equitable legal framework for prosecuting cases of reckless endangerment or second-degree assault, which carry harsher penalties than the existing statute.

Key testimonies highlighted the legacy of Carlton R. Smith, a prominent HIV/AIDS activist in Maryland, whose life and advocacy efforts were honored during the session. Advocates called for the bill to be named after Smith, recognizing his contributions to the fight against stigma and discrimination faced by those living with HIV.

The committee also addressed concerns regarding the potential implications for sex workers living with HIV. Some members questioned whether decriminalizing HIV transmission could inadvertently encourage risky behaviors. However, supporters clarified that the repeal would not endorse such actions, as existing laws would still allow for prosecution under different legal theories if there was intent to harm.

The meeting concluded with a strong call for a favorable report on the bill, reflecting a consensus among advocates and legal experts that the repeal is necessary to promote justice and public health in Maryland. The committee's next steps will involve further discussions and potential voting on the proposed legislation.