Tensions flared during the Polk County Board of Commissioners meeting on November 26, 2024, as the elected treasurer voiced frustrations over perceived obstruction in fulfilling her duties. The treasurer highlighted a series of changes to her position, which transitioned from chief treasurer's clerk to chief finance clerk, and ultimately to financial analyst, raising concerns about her supervisory role and access to necessary resources.

In a passionate address, she argued that as an elected official, she should not have to "beg" for her position or the ability to perform her job effectively. She pointed out discrepancies in the oversight structure, claiming that an unelected individual was placed in a supervisory role over her, which she deemed inappropriate. "You don't do that to the sheriff, you didn't do that to the clerk, you didn't do that to the assessor, so why are you doing it to me?" she questioned, emphasizing the need for clarity and respect for her elected role.

The discussion also touched on a court ruling that had previously addressed her concerns about obstruction by the county administrator. The treasurer insisted that the focus should be on aligning their workflow with the relevant statutes, specifically ORS 208, to ensure she could deliver essential financial reports.

As the meeting progressed, the treasurer called for a fresh examination of the duties outlined in the statute, urging the board to recognize her authority and the importance of her role in the county's financial management. The ongoing dialogue reflects a critical moment for governance in Polk County, as officials navigate the complexities of elected responsibilities and administrative oversight.