[{"_1":2,"_88":-5,"_89":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6369361,"mediaKeyId","2154862-9a4bd990381eeb7a27ade464da4eb165","parentId",2154862,"title","House adopts memorial rejecting Obergefell, urges states' authority over marriage decisions","audioSeconds",1870,"startMs",993000,"endMs",2863000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2154862-9a4bd990381eeb7a27ade464da4eb165&start=993&end=2863","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2154862-9a4bd990381eeb7a27ade464da4eb165/thumbnail_993000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6369361/Idaho/House-adopts-memorial-rejecting-Obergefell-urges-states-authority-over-marriage-decisions","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6369361-a0434476cc77dd09b90e4cf05c074379/orig.mp4?Expires=1771158769&Signature=Jg4HSuRa-6ackKxKAC~vXNLLgoIqHQCslFqkG~BJ54eSyB8G-GG7Z81-YF0M1XhfuxJplalYqSIlMvQ1IW63AOLIRAn3etgPkZXrHsn1TH4fE2LQYUe8~07-A-GCgUXOcm7svzQ6hl2GS~c11v89YRyE6GCx6bjtAOzIwXlT~~yWegAjYUCsG9chVW6g-8Y0NKBj8mjNqWg14gchjM4QJ9tVyAoT7yoWa4hdwxsTm-MjgdSCY1PQKeTt6lC6rflQT6UqKMoT4lwzeBSTwJSTlWdEDrBa9P5yDTSZBLvZ9yfv8NrVbOVZHzb0kjiSsb-IZSqiy~KtWzf6umABKx8i3Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Idaho House Legislation","date","2025-01-27T00:00:00Z","article","BOISE — The Idaho House of Representatives on Jan. 27 approved House Joint Memorial 1, a nonbinding memorial that criticizes the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges and urges restoration of marriage decision-making to the states. The measure passed on a roll-call vote, 46 ayes to 24 nays, and will be transmitted to the Senate and the chief clerk for delivery to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The memorial is explicitly nonbinding: several members noted on the floor that it is a statement rather than a law and carries no force to change federal precedent. \"This memorial is about federalism and a state's rights or their sovereignty to make decisions for ourselves. This is not a memorial about defining marriage,\" the representative from District 2 said in floor remarks introducing the measure. She described the memorial as asking the Supreme Court to revisit Obergefell and \"restore state authority.\"

Floor debate split along ideological lines. Opponents called the memorial a poor use of legislative time and said it was unlikely to change court outcomes. \"This memorial does not do that... The courts are gonna toss it in the trash. It really accomplishes nothing. It's a waste of time and money,\" the gentleman from 25 said during floor debate, urging members to reject the measure. Another member described personal stakes: \"My son, one of my sons is gay... he was very upset,\" the representative from District 18 said, urging rejection and noting community impacts.

Backers framed the memorial as a defense of state authority and criticized what they called judicial overreach by the Supreme Court. The presenter invoked dissenting opinions from the Obergefell decision and named other cases and incidents she said illustrated threats to religious liberty. The memorial's text cites Obergefell v. Hodges and references other cases and events raised during debate, including Roe v. Wade and Latta v. Otter (2014), and examples discussed on the floor such as the Kentucky clerk Kim Davis and bakers and photographers who had legal disputes over services for same-sex couples.

The House clerk announced a roll-call vote after objections were raised; the clerk recorded 46 ayes and 24 nays. The clerk confirmed the memorial \"has passed the house.\" The presenter and others stressed that the memorial will be sent to the U.S. Supreme Court, but members acknowledged the court may ignore it. The floor record noted there is no fiscal cost attached to the memorial.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","House Legislative Session Day 22 January 27, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Idaho House passed House Joint Memorial 1, a nonbinding statement urging the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit Obergefell v. Hodges and asserting that marriage decisions should be returned to the states; the memorial passed by roll call, 46-24.","taxTitle","2025 House Legislative Sessions, 2025 Legislative Sessions, Idaho","taxId",77673,"location","Idaho","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6369366,"House approves multifactor authentication requirement for access to state data",439,546000,985000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2154862-9a4bd990381eeb7a27ade464da4eb165&start=546&end=985","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2154862-9a4bd990381eeb7a27ade464da4eb165/thumbnail_546000.jpg","/articles/6369366/Idaho/House-approves-multifactor-authentication-requirement-for-access-to-state-data","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6369366-7662bb470d81b39bf62d76165afd9b59/orig.mp4?Expires=1771158769&Signature=HYH90319R8N5JT24zzw98Y5RA2ZJ~4tN~YuRagPLRllR-6fjWnfOK2mI2sPAlBD978LXvpefwy8Zfs2dhvqBbgq-hKDFXVd9LDT7dGjakDKyXp-4eBWbDG62MZ9Vdzea86T~avsoXj8lvYkXVmFDzsSe5v6Xb8d2m4suMMOKNoEOHGP9Vu7W-P5ikph0H~VOZeOce4Xzy2v1YQUjo9Jxe3zVOD4ZLA-i~aP5NUEyVHDbsYKyFD3oaNPysFX86xJNoMQqa6YrijTpdTUaoQcAgSh8VPJPICr7Y6OQI9WgIVCfEXuRzYFYUKwOpSh3snxoxZex3wzbF5~rmgc03E9~oA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","BOISE — The Idaho House of Representatives on Jan. 27 passed House Bill 35, a bill that requires anyone accessing state data to use multifactor authentication and gives the state Office of Information Technology Services (ITS) broader authority to direct cybersecurity operations across executive-branch agencies.

Supporters said the measure addresses rising cyberattacks on state systems and clarifies ITS authority where past language left enforcement to agencies’ discretion. \"Everyone who's accessing state data needs to do so using multifactor authentication,\" the representative from District 34 said while presenting the bill. She told members the change gives ITS the power to direct agencies when equipment or support is out of date, saying agencies had sometimes treated \"coordination\" as a nonbinding suggestion.

The bill outlines multiple options for a second authentication factor and does not require any single method, the presenter said. \"If you want to use your personal smartphone for the purposes of providing that second factor authentication, you can do so. If you do not want to use your personal device, there's the option that you can secure it through an additional email account or even your desk phone,\" the representative said. She also noted alternatives for locations without wireless access, citing a YubiKey-style physical security token used in Department of Corrections facilities.

Members asked about public-records implications for using personal phones as a second factor. \"Our cell phones are already subject to public records request if we conduct any official state business on them,\" the representative from District 34 replied when asked by Representative John Fippoor. She added that for multifactor purposes, \"you are simply providing verification that the device that you own is held by you, and you're providing the verification. There would be nothing to solicit other than the fact confirmation that you were the 1 that authorized access to the account.\"

Supporters emphasized cyberthreats and the need for stronger protections. \"I received a ... top secret brief on the cybersecurity threats within the state, and it would make your hair curl,\" the representative from District 14 told the chamber in a floor comment in favor of the bill.

The House closed debate without further amendments and approved the measure by roll call, 54 ayes to 16 nays. The House clerk recorded that the bill \"has passed the house\" and the title was approved for transmission to the Senate.

Clarifying details provided on the floor included that the bill's fiscal note lists no additional cost because services are already provided through the statewide cost assessment (SWICAP), according to the bill's presenter. The bill language references device-based and possession-based credentials but leaves users discretion over the method.

The bill came to the floor from committee with unanimous committee support, the presenter said. The House action was a passage vote only; any final legal effect will depend on Senate consideration and the governor's approval.

","The Idaho House passed House Bill 35 requiring multifactor authentication for access to state data and giving the state ITS stronger authority over agency cybersecurity operations; the measure passed 54-16 and will be sent to the Senate.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

House adopts memorial rejecting Obergefell, urges states' authority over marriage decisions

House approves multifactor authentication requirement for access to state data