In a recent meeting of the Public Employees Benefits Program (PEBP) Board held on January 23, 2025, passionate voices echoed through the virtual room as employees shared their heartfelt concerns regarding the potential elimination of the Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) plan. The meeting, which took place against the backdrop of ongoing discussions about healthcare accessibility in Nevada, highlighted the profound impact that such a decision could have on employees and their families.
John Jacobs, a dedicated employee of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, for 27 years, was among those who spoke out. With a personal stake in the matter as a Type 1 diabetic, Jacobs expressed his gratitude for the HMO plan, which he described as a "blessing" that has provided him and his family with essential healthcare coverage. "I just can't imagine living without having a health insurance that doesn't provide as much quality care," he stated, urging the board to reconsider any plans to eliminate the HMO policy.
The concerns were echoed by other employees, including Michael Wiger, who raised alarms about recent changes from Carson Tahoe Health regarding coverage options. Wiger noted that the shift away from Aetna and Humana plans could leave many without adequate coverage, particularly as local Medicare Advantage Plans are not covered by PEB or VIA benefits. He called for immediate rectification of this issue, emphasizing the need for accessible healthcare options.
Another poignant testimony came from Michael Amiskita, who shared his personal struggles with finding quality healthcare in Southern Nevada. He warned that the removal of the HMO would disproportionately affect marginalized communities, making healthcare even more challenging to access. "Please do not make health care more expensive for us," he implored, highlighting the broader implications of the board's decisions.
David Kelsey also voiced his concerns, particularly for his husband who has Type 2 diabetes. He stressed that the elimination of the HMO would significantly increase their out-of-pocket costs, further complicating their healthcare journey.
As the meeting progressed, the board members listened attentively to the public comments, which underscored the critical role that the HMO plan plays in the lives of many employees. The discussions not only reflected individual experiences but also painted a larger picture of the healthcare landscape in Nevada, where access to quality care remains a pressing issue.
With the meeting concluding public comments, the board now faces the challenge of balancing budgetary constraints with the health and well-being of its employees. The voices of those who spoke serve as a reminder of the human element behind policy decisions, urging the board to consider the far-reaching consequences of their actions on the lives of public employees and their families. As the future of the HMO plan hangs in the balance, the community watches closely, hopeful for a resolution that prioritizes health and accessibility.