Boston City officials are facing significant community pushback regarding the proposed redevelopment of White Stadium, as discussions during a recent government meeting highlighted concerns over the project's scale, cost, and impact on local neighborhoods.

The current plan aims to expand the stadium to accommodate 11,000 to 12,000 seats, a move that critics argue is excessive for the needs of Boston Public School students. Martha Karsher, a local resident and former president of the Franklin Park Coalition, voiced her opposition, emphasizing that the existing 10,000-seat capacity is already more than sufficient. She warned that the larger stadium would dominate Franklin Park, disrupting the natural landscape and community atmosphere.

The estimated cost of the redevelopment exceeds $91 million, raising questions about fiscal responsibility and the prioritization of public funds. Karsher pointed out an alternative design, which integrates more seamlessly into the park and costs approximately $28 million, as a more suitable option.

Concerns were also raised about the logistical implications of transporting thousands of fans to the stadium, which would involve significant traffic congestion and could negatively affect local businesses. Karsher criticized the current plan for its lack of community engagement, arguing that the process has been top-down, leaving residents with little time to consider alternative designs that might better serve the community's needs.

As the city moves forward with discussions about the stadium's future, the voices of local residents and community advocates will be crucial in shaping a project that balances the needs of Boston's youth with the preservation of Franklin Park's integrity. The outcome of this debate will not only impact the stadium's design but also set a precedent for how community input is valued in future city projects.