The Senate Judiciary Committee convened on January 22, 2025, to discuss significant constitutional matters, particularly focusing on the implications of a proposed amendment. The meeting featured testimony from various stakeholders, including veterans and local residents, who expressed strong opinions regarding the potential consequences of the amendment.

The first speaker, a disabled veteran named Mr. Burke, passionately argued against the proposed amendment, referencing historical precedents such as the prohibition era and the subsequent changes to the Constitution. He emphasized the founding fathers' vision of the Constitution as a living document, adaptable to the needs of the times. Burke expressed deep concern over the current state of the federal government, stating that it is detrimental to citizens, particularly veterans. He urged the committee not to support the amendment, imploring them to consider the potential risks involved.

Following Burke's testimony, Nicholas Skrovonic from District 29 raised additional concerns regarding the structure of a potential constitutional convention. He highlighted the disparity in representation that could arise, particularly the possibility of a disproportionate number of delegates from larger states like California compared to smaller states such as North Dakota. Skrovonic's remarks underscored fears about the fairness and equity of representation in any future constitutional discussions.

The committee did not hear any further opposition testimony, and the session concluded with an invitation for questions from the committee members. The discussions highlighted the ongoing debate about constitutional amendments and the implications for state representation and federal authority.

In summary, the meeting underscored significant apprehensions regarding the proposed amendment, with speakers advocating for caution and careful consideration of the potential impacts on state representation and the integrity of the Constitution. The committee's next steps remain to be determined as they continue to deliberate on the matter.