Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Concerns rise over George Soros funding in Article 5 constitutional convention debate

January 22, 2025 | Judiciary, Senate, Legislative, North Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Concerns rise over George Soros funding in Article 5 constitutional convention debate
During a recent Senate Judiciary meeting in North Dakota, concerns were raised regarding the potential implications of a proposed Article V convention, often referred to as a "Convention of States." The discussion highlighted fears that such a convention could serve as a "Trojan horse," leading to unintended consequences that might undermine constitutional integrity.

One speaker expressed apprehension about the involvement of influential organizations, including the George Soros Convention 2/20 Movement and various foundations, suggesting that their financial backing could skew the convention's intentions. The speaker argued that while some groups may have good intentions, the risks associated with opening up the Constitution for amendments could lead to legitimizing currently unconstitutional practices.

The speaker urged the committee to support the rescinding of House Concurrent Resolution 4003, emphasizing that the convention could create more problems than it solves. They pointed out the contentious nature of the debate, noting that there are strong opinions on both sides, but warned that the presence of "nefarious characters" could threaten the foundational principles of governance.

As the meeting concluded, the committee did not receive further testimony on the resolution, indicating a pause in the discussion surrounding the potential convention. The implications of this meeting resonate with residents who are concerned about the future of constitutional governance and the influence of external funding in shaping legislative processes. The outcome of this debate could significantly impact how North Dakotans view their representation and the integrity of their state and national laws.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Dakota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI