The New Hampshire House Science, Technology and Energy Committee convened on January 21, 2025, to discuss pressing issues related to climate change and its impacts on the state. The meeting featured a robust debate among representatives regarding the reality and implications of climate-related events affecting New Hampshire.

Representative Wendy Thomas opened the discussion by emphasizing the tangible effects of climate change already being felt in the state, including increased flooding, road damage, and challenges to the tourism industry, particularly skiing. She highlighted that warmer temperatures lead to more moisture in the air, resulting in severe summer flooding and decreased snowfall in winter, which adversely affects the ski season and lake tourism due to toxic cyanobacteria blooms.

Following her remarks, Representative Corman echoed her concerns, citing significant flooding events in the Upper Valley and the impact of extreme weather on the ski industry. He noted that unpredictable weather patterns are causing operational challenges for ski resorts, which struggle to maintain snow-making capabilities amid changing conditions.

In contrast, Representative Bernardi argued against the notion that current weather patterns are indicative of a long-term climate crisis, referencing historical weather events from the 1930s and 1950s as evidence that extreme weather is not a new phenomenon. He suggested that the perception of climate change may be influenced by modern infrastructure and population density, which amplify the economic impacts of weather events.

Representative Summers proposed a controversial solution, advocating for a 100% tariff on countries like China and India, which he claimed are responsible for a significant portion of global pollution. He argued that addressing pollution at its source would yield more substantial results than local efforts in New Hampshire.

In response, Representative Kaplan pointed out that a carbon pricing mechanism, which would tax carbon emissions from other countries, was previously discussed but not supported by some members. This highlighted a divide in the committee regarding the most effective strategies to combat climate change.

Vice Chair Thomas cautioned against presentism, the tendency to evaluate current events solely based on contemporary experiences, suggesting that historical weather patterns should inform current discussions. He urged a balanced perspective on climate events, advocating for preparedness rather than immediate economic burdens based on perceived crises.

The meeting underscored the ongoing debate within the committee about the reality of climate change and the best approaches to address its impacts. As discussions continue, the committee faces the challenge of reconciling differing viewpoints while considering the future of New Hampshire's environment and economy.